Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion.
TL;DR: In this article, physically attractive or unattractive male and female communicator-subjects delivered a persuasive message to target-subjec ts of each sex, and the results indicated that attractive (vs. unattractive) communicators induced significantly greater persuasion on both a verbal and behavioral measure of target agreement.
read more
Abstract: In a field setting, physically attractive or unattractive male and female communicator-subjects delivered a persuasive message to target-subjec ts of each sex. Results indicated that attractive (vs. unattractive) communicators induced significantly greater persuasion on both a verbal and behavioral measure of target agreement. In addition, female targets indicated greater agreement than did male targets. Data gathered from communicator-subjects during an earlier laboratory session indicated that physically attractive and unattractive communicators differed with respect to several communication skills and other attributes relevant to communicator persuasiveness, including grade point average, Scholastic Aptitude Test scores, and several measures of self-evaluati on. These findings suggest that attractive individuals may be more persuasive than unattractive persons partly because they possess characteristics that dispose them to be more effective communicators. Experimental evidence regarding the effect of communicator physical attractiveness on persuasion is equivocal. Although two studies have demonstrated that attractiveness can significantly enhance a male communicator's persuasiveness with both male and female message recipients (Horai, Naccari, & Fatoullah, 1974; Snyder & Rothbart, 1971), the majority of published experiments have failed to obtain significant attractiveness effects or have obtained interactions between attractiveness and other variables (Chaiken, Eagly, Sejwacz, Gregory, & Christensen, 1978; Mills & Aronson, 1965; Blass, Alperstein, & Block, Note 1). For example, Mills and Aronson (196S), using a female communicator and male recipients, found no overall effect of communicator attractiveness on persuasion.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
“Homosexual Marriage” or “Marriage for All”? Social Lexical Markers’ Effects on Persuasion:
TL;DR: This article analyzed the effects of social lexical markers (SLM) reflecting social groups of opinions elicit when embedded in a persuasive message and found that SLM are explicitly identified by people, but only when they are embedded in low-quality arguments persuasive messages.
5
The art of persuasion: the relevance of rhetoric today
Raquel Hidalgo Downing
- 15 Nov 2006
TL;DR: The authors present a lectura moderna de la retorica clasica, mediante la incorporación de conceptos de critica literaria and linguistica, and aplica las tecnicas al analisis of un amplio corpus that includes textos literarios, discursos politicos, articulos de prensa and anuncios publicitarios.
5
The effect of social media influencer attributes towards pro-environmental intention
Siti Fatimah Lailatul Qadrina Awang,Sharifah Nurafizah Syed Annuar,Imelda Albert Gisip +2 more
- 01 Mar 2021
TL;DR: In this article, the effect of social media influencer attributes towards attitude and pro-environmental intention was analyzed using IBM SPSS 25 and Smart PLS 3.0.
5
References
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of reward or reinforcement on preceding behavior depend in part on whether the person perceives the reward as contingent on his own behavior or independent of it, and individuals may also differ in generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
23.7K
Processes of opinion change
TL;DR: In this article, a persistent concern in the analysis of public opinion data is the "meaning" that one can ascribe to the observed distributions and trends and to the positions taken by particular individuals and segments of the population.
2.2K
Social Perception and Interpersonal Behavior: On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes
TL;DR: In this paper, the self-fulfilling influences of social stereotypes on dyadic social interaction are discussed. But the authors focus on the behavior of the target individual to confirm the perceiver's initially erroneous attributions.
On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes.
Mark Snyder
- 01 Jul 1977
TL;DR: DeScribe et al. as mentioned in this paper explored the cognitive and behavioral consequences of our impressions of other people in the context of social stereotypes and found that social stereotypes may create their own reality by channeling interaction in ways that cause the stereotyped individual to behaviorally confirm the perceiver's stereotype.
Research Note: The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations*
TL;DR: This paper found that a teacher's expectations about a child's behavior strongly influence his actual behavior, and that the teachers' expectations did in- deed have an enormous impact on students' performance, and they found that the child's attractiveness was significantly associated with how intelligent the child was, how interested in education his parents were, how far he was likely to progress in school and how popular he would be with his peers.
433