1. What are the contributions in "Collaborative governance in theory and practice" ?
In this article, the authors conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a contingency model of collaborative governance.. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of their contingency model for practitioners and for future research on collaborative governance.. In this article, the authors conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a general model of collaborative governance.. The ultimate goal is to develop a contingency approach to collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an Early versions of this article were presented at the Conference on Democratic Network Governance, Copenhagen, the Interdisciplinary Committee on Organizations at the University of California, Irvine, and the Berkeley graduate seminar Perspectives on Governance.. The authors also thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and useful comments.. Address correspondence to the author at cansell @ berkeley.. Advance Access publication on November 13, 2007 a The Author 2007.. The authors thank the participants of these events for their useful suggestions and Martha Feldman, in particular, for her encouragement.
read more
2. What have the authors stated for future works in "Collaborative governance in theory and practice" ?
The authors believe that this ‘ ‘ contingency ’ ’ approach is useful both for practitioners who may be considering the adoption of a collaborative strategy and for scholars designing future research.. For the purposes of future research, figure 1 can be treated as a hypothesis that might be evaluated using a quasi-experimental design.. Figure 1 might also suggest further case study research.. These questions and many more are suggested by figure 1.
read more
3. What is the useful strategy for assessing attitudinal change?
Pre- and postcollaboration surveys might be a particularly useful strategy for assessing attitudinal change (Blatner et al. 2001).
read more
4. What was the role of consensus in collaboratives?
In the collaboratives studied by Margerum (2002), consensus was seen as promoting representation of individual viewpoints and encouraging more cooperation.
read more
