Reference Book10.4324/9781410605795
Cognitive task analysis
Jan Maarten Schraagen,Susan F. Chipman,Valerie L. Shalin +2 more
- 01 Jan 2000
909
TL;DR: Cognitive task analysis is defined as the extension of traditional task analysis techniques to yield information about the knowledge, thought processes, and goal structures that underlie observable task performance as discussed by the authors.
read more
Abstract: Cognitive task analysis is defined as the extension of traditional task analysis techniques to yield information about the knowledge, thought processes and goal structures that underlie observable task performance. Cognitive task analyses are conducted for a wide variety of purposes, including the design of computer systems to support human work, the development of training, and the development of tests to certify competence. As part of its Programme of Work, NATO Research Study Group 27 on Cognitive Task Analysis has undertaken the task of reviewing existing cognitive task analysis techniques. The Group concludes that few integrated methods exist, that little attention is being paid to the conditions under which methods are appropriate, and that often it is unclear how the products of cognitive task analysis should be used. RSG.27 has also organized a workshop with experts in the field of cognitive task analysis. The most important issues that were discussed during the workshop were: (1) the use of CTA in the design of new systems, (2) the question when to use what technique, and (3) the role of CTA in system design. RSG.27 emphasizes: (1) that is important for the CTA community to be able to empirically demonstrate the added value of a CTA; (2) it is critical for the success of CTA to be involved in the design process from the start to finish, and to establish clear links with methods that are used by other disciplines, and (3) recommends that more research effort be directed to the issue of the reliability of CTA techniques. (P)
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching
TL;DR: In this article, the superiority of guided instruction is explained in the context of our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, expert-novice differences, and cognitive load, and it is shown that the advantage of guidance begins to recede only when learners have sufficiently high prior knowledge to provide "internal" guidance.
Running head: WHY MINIMALLY GUIDED INSTRUCTION DOES NOT WORK Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching
Paul A. Kirschner,John Sweller +1 more
- 01 Jan 2006
Abstract: Evidence for the superiority of guided instruction is explained in the context of our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, expert–novice differences, and cognitive load. Although unguided or minimally guided instructional approaches are very popular and intuitively appealing, the point is made that these approaches ignore both the structures that constitute human cognitive architecture and evidence from empirical studies over the past half-century that consistently indicate that minimally guided instruction is less effective and less efficient than instructional approaches that place a strong emphasis on guidance of the student learning process. The advantage of guidance begins to recede only when learners have sufficiently high prior knowledge to provide "internal" guidance. Recent developments in instructional research and instructional design models that support guidance during instruction are briefly described.
5.6K
Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree.
Daniel Kahneman,Gary Klein +1 more
TL;DR: Evaluating the likely quality of an intuitive judgment requires an assessment of the predictability of the environment in which the judgment is made and of the individual's opportunity to learn the regularities of that environment.
2.3K
The Science of Training: A Decade of Progress
TL;DR: This chapter reviews the training research literature reported over the past decade and suggests that advancements have been made that help to understand better the design and delivery of training in organizations with respect to theory development as well as the quality and quantity of empirical research.
1.8K
References
•Book
Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research
Jerome Kirk,Marc L. Miller +1 more
- 01 Dec 1985
TL;DR: Kirk and Miller as mentioned in this paper discuss the scientific status of field data and provide a practical guide for participant-observation fieldwork, and present a process model for fieldwork.
2.9K
Related Papers (5)
Stuart K. Card,Allen Newell,Thomas P. Moran +2 more
- 01 Jan 1983
Gary Klein,Roberta Calderwood,Donald G. MacGregor +2 more
- 01 May 1989