Journal Article10.1016/J.PAID.2009.11.007
Cognitive emotion regulation strategies: Gender differences and associations to worry
218
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the differences in use of cognitive emotion regulation strategies between males and females and the subsequent effect on worry and found that females significantly differed in the endorsement of use of rumination, putting problems into perspective and blaming others as emotional regulation strategies.
read more
About: This article is published in Personality and Individual Differences. The article was published on 01 Mar 2010. The article focuses on the topics: Worry & Anxiety.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The Future of Emotion Regulation Research: Capturing Context.
TL;DR: The author proposes an approach to systematically evaluate the contextual factors shaping emotion regulation by specifying the components that characterize emotion regulation and then systematically evaluating deviations within each of these components and their underlying dimensions.
876
Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination
TL;DR: It is suggested that the use of maladaptive strategies might play a more central role in psychopathology than the non-use of adaptive strategies and provide support of a transdiagnostic view of cognitive emotion regulation.
795
The structure of common emotion regulation strategies: A meta-analytic examination.
TL;DR: A meta-analysis estimating the correlations between emotion regulation strategies, as well as between distress tolerance and strategies, found that distress tolerance was most closely associated with low levels of repetitive negative thought and experiential avoidance, and high levels of acceptance and mindfulness.
432
Gender differences in the prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury: A meta-analysis
TL;DR: The results showed that across studies women were significantly more likely to report a history of NSSI than men, and Moderator analyses showed that the gender difference was larger for clinical samples, compared to college/community samples, and there was not a significant relation between age and effect size.
432
The influence of context on the implementation of adaptive emotion regulation strategies.
TL;DR: Support is found for a contextual model of emotion regulation, in which adaptive strategies were implemented with more cross-situational variability than maladaptive strategies, and the variability in implementation of two adaptive strategies predicted lower levels of psychopathology.
347
References
Modification of Life Event Questionnaires for Use with Female Respondents
TL;DR: The purpose of this research was to increase the relevance of a life-event questionnaire for adult female respondents of childbearing age, and the negative events score was related to negative mood states and psychiatric symptoms.
255
Problem Solving and Problem Orientation in Generalized Anxiety Disorder
TL;DR: The results show that problem orientation, intolerance of uncertainty, and beliefs about worry were similar in subjects meeting GAD criteria by questionnaire and GAD patients, whereas moderate worriers had different scores on these variables.
194
Looming vulnerability to threat: a cognitive paradigm for anxiety.
TL;DR: The looming vulnerability model is presented, conceptualized as an important cognitive component of threat or danger that elicits anxiety, sensitizes the individual to signs of movement and threat, biases cognitive processing, and makes the anxiety more persistent and less likely to habituate.
184
The contributory role of worry in emotion generation and dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder.
TL;DR: Intensity of emotions and emotion regulation were examined following the induction period and film clip, and individuals with GAD in the worry condition experienced more intense depressed affect than GAD participants in the other conditions and controls participants.
160
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.
TL;DR: Fact analyses of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire revealed that factor 1 (Worry Engagement) explained the majority of the variance in the symptom measures and the higher order worry factor also accounted for variance in some measures.
156