Journal Article10.1002/ase.70099
Cognitive apprenticeship in the anatomical sciences: A study of the relationship between the anatomical expertise and clinical expertise of medical students as demonstrated on standardized assessments
Bradley R. Collins,Kent J. Crippen,Phuong B. Huynh,Anne Corinne Huggins‐Manley,Kyle E. Rarey +4 more
TL;DR: This study examines the relationship between anatomical expertise and clinical expertise in medical students, using data from 108 students, and finds a significant correlation between gross anatomy knowledge and performance on standardized clinical assessments, supporting the cognitive apprenticeship framework.
read more
Abstract: Abstract Knowledge of gross anatomy and embryology continues to be important for medical student training. However, the relevance of anatomical knowledge during the preclinical years remains underexplored considering recent revisions to the scoring of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). Guided by the framework of cognitive apprenticeship, which conceptualizes the anatomy laboratory as a learning environment that leads to medical student expertise, the focus of this study was on the relationship between the anatomical expertise and clinical expertise of medical students as measured by scores on standardized assessments. Data from 108 medical students who graduated as part of the Class of 2024 at a Southeastern institution were included in the analysis. A multiple linear regression model was created with the predictor variables of Gross Anatomy and Embryology Sub‐score on the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Comprehensive Basic Science Examination and MCAT Score for each of the following outcome variables: USMLE Step 2 Score; NBME Clinical Science Subject Examination (CSSE) Scores for Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Psychiatry, Family Medicine, and Clinical Neurology; and NBME Advanced CSSE Score for Emergency Medicine. In the resulting models, Gross Anatomy and Embryology Sub‐score was a statistically significant predictor of USMLE Step 2 Score as well as for all NBME CSSE Scores and NBME Advanced CSSE Scores. The findings of this study support cognitive apprenticeship as a theoretical perspective for anatomical sciences education by providing evidence for a relationship between medical students' anatomical expertise and clinical expertise.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
Predicting performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge using results from previous examinations.
TL;DR: A score <66 in the NBME CBSE might indicate failure during the USMLE Step 1 first take, and a score <208 in the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 might predict failure in the US MLE Step 2 CK.