Open Access
CoevolutionofInformationSharingandImplementation ofEvidence-BasedPracticesAmongNorthAmerican TobaccoCessationQuitlines
Liesbeth Mercken,Jessie E. Saul,Robin H. Lemaire,Thomas W. Valente,Scott J. Leischow +4 more
- 01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: The findings show the importance of monitoring the NAQC network over time and recommend increased cross-border information sharing and sharing of information between funders contracting with different and smaller service providers.
read more
Abstract: Objectives. We examined the coevolution of information sharing and implementation of evidence-based practices among US and Canadian tobacco cessation quitlines within the North American Quitline Consortium (NAQC). Methods. Web-based surveys were used to collect data from key respondents representing each of 74 participating funders of NAQC quitlines during the summer and fall of 2009, 2010, and 2011. We used stochastic actor-based models to estimate changes in information sharing and practice implementation in the NAQC network. Results. Funders were more likely to share information within their own country and with funders that contracted with the same service provider. Funders contracting with larger service providers shared less information but implemented significantly more practices. Funders connected to larger numbers of tobacco control researchers more often received information from other funders. Intensity of ties to the NAQC network administrative organization did not influence funders’ decisions to share information or implement practices. Conclusions. Our findings show the importance of monitoring the NAQC network over time. We recommend increased cross-border information sharing and sharing of information between funders contracting with different and smaller service providers. (Am J Public Health. 2015;105:1814‐1822. doi:10.2105/ AJPH.2015.302627)
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
Keith G. Provan,Patrick Kenis +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, three basic models or forms of network governance are developed focusing on their distinct structural properties and the tensions inherent in each form are discussed, followed by the role that management may play in addressing these tensions.
Network dynamics and field evolution : The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences
TL;DR: In this article, a recursive analysis of network and institutional evolution is offered to account for the decentralized structure of the commercial field of the life sciences, and four alternative logics of attachment are tested to explain the structure and dynamics of interorganizational collaboration in biotechnology using multiple novel methods.
Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics
TL;DR: Stochastic actor-based models as discussed by the authors are models for network dynamics that can represent a wide variety of influences on network change, and allow to estimate parameters expressing such influences, and test corresponding hypotheses.
2K
The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics
TL;DR: A class of statistical models is proposed for longitudinal network data that are continuous-time Markov chain models that can be implemented as simulation models and statistical procedures are proposed that are based on the method of moments.
Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance Implications: Lessons from Biotechnology Start-ups
Indre Maurer,Mark Ebers +1 more
TL;DR: Based on comparative longitudinal case analyses of six new biotechnology firms, the authors explores how the configuration, management, and evolution of entrepreneurial firms' social capital affect the performance of these firms.
725