Journal Article10.1111/J.1540-627X.2009.00273.X
Co-opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model
Devi R. Gnyawali,Byung-Jin Park +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that co-opetition strategy can be used to simultaneously pursue the pursuit of technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
read more
Abstract: Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (SMEs) face tremendous challenges in their attempt to pursue technological innovations. This paper argues that co‐opetition strategy—simultaneous pursuit of compe...
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation
Devi R. Gnyawali,Byung-Jin Park +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate why and how co-opetition between large firms occurs, evolves, and impacts the participating firms and the industry and develop a multi-level conceptual framework by combining literature-based conceptual arguments and insights from an in-depth study of an exemplar case of co-operative competition between Samsung Electronics and Sony Corporation.
999
•Posted Content
Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning
Peter J. Lane,Michael Lubatkin +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reconceptualize the firm-level construct absorptive capacity as a learning dyad-level measure, relative absorptive capacities, and test the model using a sample of pharmaceutical-biotechnology R&D alliances.
673
Coopetition—Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges
Maria Bengtsson,Sören Kock +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors suggest that the early definition of co-copetition, as a dual relationship between firms that simultaneously cooperate and compete, needs to be refined, and suggest that coopetition is a paradoxical relationship between two or more actors, regardless of whether they are in horizontal or vertical relationships.
662
Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions
TL;DR: A systematic literature review and a synthesis of high-quality contributions in this field with a focus on a general overview of research on co-copetition, coopetition as a strategy, and the management of co-opetition is presented in this article.
597
Coopetition Strategy – When is it Successful? Empirical Evidence on Innovation and Market Performance
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the effect of a co-competition strategy on the firm's innovation and market performance, focusing on the moderating effects of market uncertainty, network externalities and competitive intensity.
544
References
Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences
TL;DR: In this article, an attempt is made to clarify our understanding of the motives that lead firms to cooperate in their innovative efforts, and attention is paid to both sectoral differences in the motivation for partnerships as well as to contrasts in interorganizational features of technology cooperation.
2.5K
Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the phenomenon of the transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices within multinational companies using a cross-disciplinary approach and develop a multilevel model of transfer success based on the notion of the contextual embeddedness of the process of transfer.
2.1K
”Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously
Maria Bengtsson,Sören Kock +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, it is argued that the most complex, but also the most advantageous relationship between competitors, is "cooperative" where two competitors both compete and cooperate with each other.
2K
Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development
Abstract: We link the exploration–exploitation framework of organizational learning to a technology venture's strategic alliances and argue that the causal relationship between the venture's alliances and its new product development depends on the type of the alliance. In particular, we propose a product development path beginning with exploration alliances predicting products in development, which in turn predict exploitation alliances, and that concludes with exploitation alliances leading to products on the market. Moreover, we argue that this integrated product development path is moderated negatively by firm size. As a technology venture grows, it tends to withdraw from this product development path to discover, develop, and commercialize promising projects through vertical integration. We test our model on a sample of 325 biotechnology firms that entered 2565 alliances over a 25-year period. We find broad support for the hypothesized product development system and the moderating effect of firm size. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2K