Reference Entry10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.10
Children’s Use of Syntax In Word Learning
Jeffrey Lidz
- 07 Jan 2022
pp 355-377
3
TL;DR: The authors investigated the role of syntax in guiding the acquisition of word meaning and found that children can use the syntactic distribution of a word as evidence for its meaning and discuss the principles of grammar that license such inferences.
read more
Abstract: This chapter investigates the role that syntax plays in guiding the acquisition of word meaning. It reviews data that reveal how children can use the syntactic distribution of a word as evidence for its meaning and discusses the principles of grammar that license such inferences. We delineate the role of thematic linking generalizations in the acquisition of action verbs, arguing that children use specific links between subject and agent and between object and patient to guide initial verb learning. In the domain of attitude verbs, we show that children’s knowledge of abstract links between subclasses of attitude verbs and their syntactic distribution enable learners to identify the meanings of their initial attitude verbs, such as think and want. Finally, we show that syntactic bootstrapping effects are not limited to verb learning but extend across the lexicon.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Stochastic LLMs do not Understand Language: Towards Symbolic, Explainable and Ontologically Based LLMs
TL;DR: This paper suggests in this paper applying the effective bottom-up strategy in a symbolic setting resulting in symbolic, explainable, and ontologically grounded language models.
Lexicalization in the developing parser
A. S. White,Jeffrey Lidz +1 more
TL;DR: The authors showed that children encode the syntactic distributions of particular verbs and use those distributions to make predictions, but they do not assume that these can be used for verbs in general, and they take away children's ability to rely on lexically specific knowledge, as in the current study.
Stochastic LLMs do not Understand Language: Towards Symbolic, Explainable and Ontologically Based LLMs
Walid S. Saba
TL;DR: LLMs lack factual accuracy, subsymbolic nature and fail to make correct inferences in various linguistic contexts. Symbolic, explainable and ontologically grounded LLMs are proposed as an alternative.
References
Modelling neural correlates of working memory: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.
Claudia Rottschy,Robert Langner,Robert Langner,Imis Dogan,Kathrin Reetz,Kathrin Reetz,Angela R. Laird,Jörg B. Schulz,Peter T. Fox,Simon B. Eickhoff,Simon B. Eickhoff +10 more
TL;DR: Meta-analyses are a powerful tool to integrate the data of functional imaging studies on a (broader) psychological construct, probing the consistency across various paradigms as well as the differential effects of different experimental implementations.
956
What some concepts might not be.
TL;DR: Three experiments that inquire how well-defined concepts fare under paradigms that are commonly interpreted to support the prototype view show that both well- defined and prototypic categories yield graded responses, the supposed hall-mark of a family resemblance structure.
951
Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination
Jonathan Winawer,Nathan Witthoft,Nathan Witthoft,Michael C. Frank,Lisa Wu,Alex R. Wade,Lera Boroditsky +6 more
TL;DR: It is found that Russian speakers were faster to discriminate two colors when they fell into different linguistic categories in Russian than when they were from the same linguistic category (both siniy or both goluboy).
Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Meta-Analysis
TL;DR: A quantitative meta-analysis evaluating the effects of systematic phonics instruction compared to unsystematic or no-phonics instruction on learning to read was conducted using 66 treatment-control comparisons derived from 38 experiments as mentioned in this paper.
950
At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns
Elika Bergelson,Daniel Swingley +1 more
TL;DR: In fact, infants already know the meanings of several common words from the age of 6 mo onward, demonstrating that, contrary to prevailing beliefs, either infants can already grasp the referential intentions of adults at 6 mo or infants can learn words before this ability emerges.
947
Related Papers (5)
Karine Megerdoomian
- 01 Jan 2000
Michihiko Kawamura
- 01 Jan 1994
Stephen R. Willson
- 01 Jan 1996
Maryvonne Abraham
- 01 Jan 2007