1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: an exploratory, qualitative analysis" ?
The paper reports on some of the results of a research project into how changes in digital behaviour and services impacts on concepts of trust and authority held by researchers in the sciences and social sciences in the UK and the USA.
read more
2. What was the main reason why researchers would run different analyses on the data?
(When) you were critiquing a paper you would normally run a different analysis on the data to show why your analysis was betterHowever, although access to full content was much more important than access to data when trust was involved, increased access to data was seen as one of those aspects of change that was positive.
read more
3. What was the main reason why the researchers were regularly cited in papers?
Another group of references regularly cited by the researchers interviewed were regularly cited in papers published by the author because they were part of the literature related to the work being discussed in the paper which was known to be trustworthy and part of the stock of knowledge relied upon.
read more
4. How many of the researchers interviewed said they always checked a potential citation using their own criteria?
A little over half of the researchers interviewed claimed that they always checked, with specific exceptions, a potential citation using their own criteria to establish that it could be trusted.
read more

