1. What have the authors contributed in "Castor: a generic data organization and processing code framework for multi-modal and multi-dimensional tomographic reconstruction" ?
The implementation of a given reconstruction algorithm is usually limited to a specific set of conditions, depending on the modality, the purpose of the study, the input data, or on the characteristics of the reconstruction algorithm itself.. This work attempts to address these issues by proposing a unified and generic code framework for formatting, processing and reconstructing acquired multi-modal and multi-dimensional data.
read more
2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Castor: a generic data organization and processing code framework for multi-modal and multi-dimensional tomographic reconstruction" ?
Future work will focus on using vectorial instructions intrinsically available on current CPU architectures.
read more
3. How many iterations did the reconstruction use?
The reconstruction was based on the maximumlikelihood gradient-ascent algorithm for transmission tomography (MLTR) (Slambrouck & Nuyts 2014) with 30 iterations and 80 subsets.
read more
4. What are the advantages of using matched projectors?
When using matched projectors, the computed system matrix elements areused for both forward and backward projections, without having to compute them twice.
read more





![Figure 5. Whole-body [18F]-FDG data set acquired on a SIGNA PET/MR system with (top) manufacturer (middle) CASToR list-mode and (bottom) CASToR histogram reconstructions including TOF information (see text for details). The horizontal lines in the axial slices show the location of the transverse profiles and the ellipses correspond to the liver ROI. Arrows in the coronal images show the tumour for which the contrast was calculated. Data courtesy of Dr. Michaël Soussan.](/figures/figure-5-whole-body-18f-fdg-data-set-acquired-on-a-signa-pet-38zsi3ys.png)