Journal Article10.7326/m21-4520
Cannabis-Based Products for Chronic Pain
64
TL;DR: In this article , the authors evaluated the benefits and harms of cannabinoids for chronic pain and concluded that products with high THC-to-CBD ratios may be associated with moderate improvement in pain severity and response (≥30% improvement) and an increased risk for sedation and are probably associated with a large increased risk of dizziness.
read more
Abstract: Background: Contemporary data are needed about the utility of cannabinoids in chronic pain. Purpose: To evaluate the benefits and harms of cannabinoids for chronic pain. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus to January 2022. Study Selection: English-language, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and cohort studies (≥1 month duration) of cannabinoids for chronic pain. Data Extraction: Data abstraction, risk of bias, and strength of evidence assessments were dually reviewed. Cannabinoids were categorized by THC-to-CBD ratio (high, comparable, or low) and source (synthetic, extract or purified, or whole plant). Data Synthesis: Eighteen randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n = 1740) and 7 cohort studies (n = 13 095) assessed cannabinoids. Studies were primarily short term (1 to 6 months); 56% enrolled patients with neuropathic pain, with 3% to 89% female patients. Synthetic products with high THC-to-CBD ratios (>98% THC) may be associated with moderate improvement in pain severity and response (≥30% improvement) and an increased risk for sedation and are probably associated with a large increased risk for dizziness. Extracted products with high THC-to-CBD ratios (range, 3:1 to 47:1) may be associated with large increased risk for study withdrawal due to adverse events and dizziness. Sublingual spray with comparable THC-to-CBD ratio (1.1:1) probably is associated with small improvement in pain severity and overall function and may be associated with large increased risk for dizziness and sedation and moderate increased risk for nausea. Evidence for other products and outcomes, including longer-term harms, were not reported or were insufficient. Limitation: Variation in interventions; lack of study details, including unclear availability in the United States; and inadequate evidence for some products. Conclusion: Oral, synthetic cannabis products with high THC-to-CBD ratios and sublingual, extracted cannabis products with comparable THC-to-CBD ratios may be associated with short-term improvements in chronic pain and increased risk for dizziness and sedation. Studies are needed on long-term outcomes and further evaluation of product formulation effects. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (PROSPERO: CRD42021229579)
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
[Cannabis in oncology - much ado about nothing?]
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors focus on supportive medicine for oncological patients, which includes pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite and altered taste perception, and the key parameter for choosing a cannabis medicinal product is the THC/CBD ratio.
[Cannabis in oncology - much ado about nothing?]
TL;DR: This article focuses on supportive medicine for oncological patients with palliative patients with refractory symptoms and the key parameter for choosing a cannabis medicinal product is the THC/CBD ratio.
References
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
TL;DR: A new quantity is developed, I 2, which the authors believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis, which is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta- analysis.
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P T Higgins,Douglas G. Altman test,Peter C Gøtzsche,Peter Jüni,David Moher,Andrew D Oxman,Jelena Savović,Kenneth F. Schulz,Laura Weeks,Jonathan A C Sterne +9 more
TL;DR: The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate.
30.5K
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016.
Deborah Dowell,Tamara M. Haegerich,Roger Chou +2 more
- 18 Mar 2016
TL;DR: This guideline is intended to improve communication between clinicians and patients about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy for chronic pain, improve the safety and effectiveness of pain treatment, and reduce the risks associated with long-term opioid therapy, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death.
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016
TL;DR: This guideline is intended to improve communication about benefits and risks of opioids for chronic pain, improve safety and effectiveness of pain treatment, and reduce risks associated with long-term opioid therapy.
Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults - United States, 2016.
James M. Dahlhamer,Jacqueline W. Lucas,Carla E. Zelaya,Richard L. Nahin,Sean Mackey,Lynn DeBar,Robert D. Kerns,Michael Von Korff,Linda Porter,Charles G. Helmick +9 more
TL;DR: The prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain in the United States is analyzed to help differentiate persons with limitations in major life domains from those who maintain normal life activities despite chronic pain, providing a better understanding of the population in need of pain services.
2.1K