1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "C: " ?
Using free–free emission measured in the Ka band ( 26–40 GHz ) for 10 star-forming regions in the nearby galaxy NGC 6946, including its starbursting nucleus, the authors compare a number of star formation rate ( SFR ) diagnostics that are typically considered to be unaffected by interstellar extinction.. The assumption is made that the 33 GHz free–free emission provides the most accurate measure of the current SFR.. Finally, the authors find that the SFRs estimated using the total 33 GHz flux density appear to agree well with those estimated using free–free emission due to the large thermal fractions present at these frequencies even when local diffuse backgrounds are not removed.. This result likely arises from the cosmic-ray ( CR ) electrons decaying within the starburst region with negligible escape, whereas the transient nature of star formation in the young extranuclear star-forming complexes allows for CR electrons to diffuse significantly further than dust-heating photons, resulting in an underestimate of the true SFR.
read more
2. How many apertures were used to measure the local background?
The local background estimates were measured by placing four 25′′ diameter apertures at a distance of 1.5 times the beam FWHM (i.e., 37.′′5) away from the center of the source positions in each of the four cardinal directions.
read more
3. At what frequencies have calibrations between the supernova rate and the SN?
At lower radio frequencies, which are typically dominated by non-thermal synchrotron emission, calibrations between the supernova rate, and thus the SFR, have been developed.
read more
4. Why was the flux density of the extranuclear region boosted?
The authors note that the 33 GHz flux density of extranuclear region 8 was boosted due to potential oversubtraction of background emission which may not have been adequate.
read more





