Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems - a review
TL;DR: The application of bio-char (charcoal or biomass-derived black carbon (C)) to soil is pro- posed as a novel approach to establish a significant, long-term, sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide in terrestrial ecosystems.
read more
Abstract: The application of bio-char (charcoal or biomass-derived black carbon (C)) to soil is pro- posed as a novel approach to establish a significant, long-term, sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide in terrestrial ecosystems. Apart from positive effects in both reducing emissions and increasing the sequestration of greenhouse gases, the production of bio-char and its application to soil will deliver im- mediate benefits through improved soil fertility and increased crop production. Conversion of biomass C to bio-char C leads to sequestration of about 50% of the initial C compared to the low amounts retained after burning (3%) and biological decomposition (<10-20% after 5-10 years), therefore yielding more stable soil C than burning or direct land application of biomass. This efficiency of C conversion of biomass to bio-char is highly dependent on the type of feedstock, but is not significantly affected by the pyrolysis temperature (within 350-500 ◦ C common for pyrolysis). Existing slash-and- burn systems cause significant degradation of soil and release of greenhouse gases and opportunies may exist to enhance this system by conversion to slash-and-char systems. Our global analysis revealed that up to 12% of the total anthropogenic C emissions by land use change (0.21 Pg C) can be off-set annually in soil, if slash-and-burn is replaced by slash-and-char. Agricultural and forestry wastes such as forest residues, mill residues, field crop residues, or urban wastes add a conservatively estimated 0.16 Pg C yr −1 . Biofuel production using modern biomass can produce a bio-char by-product through pyrolysis which results in 30.6 kg C sequestration for each GJ of energy produced. Using published projections of the use of renewable fuels in the year 2100, bio-char sequestration could amount to 5.5-9.5 Pg C yr −1 if this demand for energy was met through pyrolysis, which would exceed current emissions from fossil fuels (5.4 Pg C yr −1 ). Bio-char soil management systems can deliver tradable C emissions reduction, and C sequestered is easily accountable, and verifiable.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective
Terry Barker,I. Bashmakov,Awwad Alharthi,Markus Ammann,Luis Cifuentes,John Drexhage,Duan Maosheng,Ottmar Edenhofer,Brian Flannery,Michael Grubb,Monique Hoogwijk,Francis Ibitoye,Catrinus J. Jepma,William A. Pizer,Kenji Yamaji,Shimon Awerbuch,Lenny Bernstein,André Faaij,Hitoshi Hayami,Tom Heggedal,Snorre Kverndokk,John Latham,Axel Michaelowa,David Popp,Peter L. Read,Stefan Schleicher,Michael D. Smith,Ferenc Toth,Bert Metz,Ogunlade Davidson,Peter Bosch,Rutu Dave,Leo Meyer +32 more
- 01 Jan 2007
5.1K
Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reviewed the technologies underpinning microalgae-to-bio-fuels systems, focusing on the biomass production, harvesting, conversion technologies, and the extraction of useful co-products.
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Johannes Lehmann,Matthias C. Rillig,Janice E. Thies,Caroline A. Masiello,William C. Hockaday,David E. Crowley +5 more
TL;DR: A review of the literature reveals a significant number of early studies on biochar-type materials as soil amendments either for managing pathogens, as inoculant carriers or for manipulative experiments to sorb signaling compounds or toxins as mentioned in this paper.
4.5K
A handful of carbon
TL;DR: On the climate change mitigation front, the incorporation of ‘biochar’ into the soil is one idea gaining support, and Johannes Lehmann argues that trapping biomass carbon in this way is more effective than storing it in plants and trees that will one day decompose.
2.4K
Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change
TL;DR: The maximum sustainable technical potential of biochar to mitigate climate change is estimated, which shows that it has a larger climate-change mitigation potential than combustion of the same sustainably procured biomass for bioenergy, except when fertile soils are amended while coal is the fuel being offset.
References
Potential of Co2 emission reductions by carbonizing biomass waste from industrial tree plantation in South Sumatra, Indonesia
TL;DR: In this article, a project on biomass utilization and forest conservation is proposed as a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project, by incorporating the carbonization of biomass residue and waste from tree plantations and pulp mills, and also the utilization of carbon products in various fields.
Interactive priming of black carbon and glucose mineralisation
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the effect of 14 C-glucose addition on the mineralisation of charred maize and rye residues and oak wood (thermally altered at 800 C).
Determination of calorific values of bio-chars and pyro-oils from pyrolysis of beech trunkbarks
TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of both the heating rate and temperature of pyrolysis on pyro-oil and biochar yields and their characteristics were investigated, and it was concluded that both the temperature and heating rate had a significant effect on both yield of bio-char and pyrooil.
Storing Carbon on Land
Robert J. Scholes,Ian R. Noble +1 more
TL;DR: The terrestrial biosphere currently absorbs about a quarter of the anthropogenic carbon emissions as discussed by the authors, and this carbon sink can help to mitigate climate change, provided that steps to reduce emissions from fossil fuel combustion are not compromised and deforestation is avoided.
Mitigation of atmospheric CO2 concentrations by increased carbon sequestration in the soil
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reviewed options for sustained sequestration of CO2 in the soil through adapted management of land resources in the context of the ongoing discussion on the need to reduce greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.