Peer Review10.1080/0960085X.2022.2039563
BIBGT: combining bibliometrics and grounded theory to conduct a literature review
Isabelle Walsh,Frantz Rowe +1 more
16
TL;DR: In this article , a method combining bibliometrics and grounded theory is proposed to conduct literature reviews that have a descriptive, understanding or explanatory purpose. But this method is not suitable for large scale reviews.
read more
Abstract: ABSTRACT In the current context of scientific information overload, we propose a method combining bibliometrics and grounded theory to conduct literature reviews that have a descriptive, understanding or explanatory purpose. This overall inductive combined method, which we name BIBGT (BIB = Bibliometrics; GT = Grounded Theory) provides a powerful instrument for researchers. This instrument has been made more readily accessible by recent technological developments, and scientific advances in the field of bibliometrics. Notably, BIBGT helps grounded theorists identify colleges of thought of the field being reviewed, and representative texts to be reviewed in depth, in each college; it improves the trustworthiness and efficiency of reviews. BIBGT helps bibliometricians achieve in-depth analysis and interpretation of their findings. For all researchers, BIBGT can nurture the emergence of novel insights towards in-depth description, understanding or explanation of a core concept, theme, or research domain. We detail the four steps of this flexible method, providing essential elements and some guidelines as well as an illustration, to help other researchers who wish to apply it.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
ARTICLE RETIRÉ : ARTIREV: An Integrated Bibliometric Tool to Efficiently Conduct Quality Literature Reviews
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors propose an approach based on a logiciel bibliomatique of documents, which can be used to assist the conduite de revues de littérature of documents.
11
Enhancing e-commerce recommendation systems through approach of buyer's self-construal: necessity, theoretical ground, synthesis of a six-step model, and research agenda
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors present a methodology to quantify consumers' self-identities to help examine the relationship between these psychological cues and decision-making in an e-commerce context, focusing on the projective self.
Leveraging Systems Thinking, Engagement, and Digital Competencies to Enhance First-Year Architecture Students’ Achievement in Design-Based Learning
Stanislav Avsec,Magdalena Jagiello-Kowalczyk,Agnieszka Žabicka,Agata Gawlak,Joanna Gil-Mastalerczyk +4 more
TL;DR: The results indicate that systems thinking centered around the understanding of feedback behaviors and causal sequences in the system has a direct effect on the design outcome and ICT self-concept related to problem solving and cognitive engagement, while, indirectly, systems thinking also mediates achievement in design courses.
5
References
Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine three methodological questions that are generally applicable to all qualitative methods: how should the usual scientific canons be reinterpreted for qualitative research? How should researchers report the procedures and canons used in their research? What evaluative criteria should be used in judging the research products?
•Posted Content
Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review
TL;DR: The extent to which the process of systematic review can be applied to the management field in order to produce a reliable knowledge stock and enhanced practice by developing context-sensitive research is evaluated.
9.2K
A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Maria J. Grant,Andrew Booth +1 more
TL;DR: Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive, but this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.
•Journal Article
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review
Jane Webster,Richard T. Watson +1 more
TL;DR: A review of prior, relevant literature is an essential feature of any academic project that facilitates theory development, closes areas where a plethora of research exists, and uncovers areas where research is needed.