Book Chapter10.7758/9781610448864.17
Bayesian meta-analysis
Rebecca M. Turner,Julian P. T. Higgins +1 more
- 14 Jun 2019
- pp 299-314
7
About: The article was published on 14 Jun 2019.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Comparison of commonly used methods in random effects meta-analysis: application to preclinical data in drug discovery research
Ezgi Tanriver-Ayder,Christel Faes,Tom Van De Casteele,Sarah K. McCann,Malcolm R. Macleod +4 more
- 01 Feb 2021
TL;DR: The methodological challenges in preclinical meta-analysis in estimating and explaining heterogeneity in treatment effects are reviewed, and the importance of careful selection of the estimation method and the use of multivariable meta-regression to explain heterogeneity is highlighted.
38
Meta-analysis
TL;DR: A review of meta-analytic methods relevant to sport and exercise psychology can be found in this article , where the authors highlight the imperative of precision and integrity in the conduct of metaanalysis in the discipline.
3
Bayesian hypothesis testing and estimation under the marginalized random-effects meta-analysis model
TL;DR: This work proposes Bayesian hypothesis testing and estimation methods using the marginalized random-effects meta-analysis (MAREMA) model where the study-specific true effects are regarded as nuisance parameters which are integrated out of the model.