Barriers and facilitators for male carers in accessing formal and informal support : a systematic review
Nan Greenwood,Raymond Smith +1 more
112
TL;DR: This systematic review of research investigating adult male carers' experiences of accessing formal and informal support focussing on the barriers and facilitators identified seven studies from North America, most focussed on older carers caring for people with dementia.
read more
About: This article is published in Maturitas. The article was published on 01 Oct 2015. and is currently open access. The article focuses on the topics: Caring for people with dementia & Health services research.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Hearing Their Voice: A Systematic Review of Dementia Family Caregivers’ Needs
TL;DR: Caregivers' unmet needs highlight key areas for improvement in policy and service provision and demonstrate the need for more rigorous qualitative studies exploring the perceived needs of partner and offspring caregivers respectively.
264
Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: Findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries
Astrid Stephan,Anja Bieber,Louise Hopper,Rachael Joyce,Kate Irving,Orazio Zanetti,Elisa Portolani,Liselot Kerpershoek,Frans R.J. Verhey,Marjolein E. de Vugt,Claire A. G. Wolfs,Siren Eriksen,Janne Røsvik,Maria J. Marques,Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira,Britt-Marie Sjölund,Hannah Jelley,Bob Woods,Gabriele Meyer +18 more
TL;DR: Further investigations are needed to elaborate how the concept of a key contact person could be integrated with existing case management approaches and how the independence and autonomy of people with dementia can be strengthened when formal care needs to be accessed and used.
Influences on the access to and use of formal community care by people with dementia and their informal caregivers: a scoping review
TL;DR: The findings indicate that people with dementia should more often be included in healthcare service research to ensure a better understanding of the barriers to accessing formal community care and a theoretical framework would likely help to describe this complex subject.
The Self-Care Needs and Behaviors of Dementia Informal Caregivers: A Systematic Review.
TL;DR: Self-care behaviors identified by this review were engaging in activities with the PWD, spiritual and religious activities, and taking a break from caregiving, while barriers to self-care were gender roles, self-sacrificing, minority ethnicity, and burden of caregiving.
82
Dementia-Related Education and Support Service Availability, Accessibility, and Use in Rural Areas: Barriers and Solutions
TL;DR: Findings suggest limited availability of rural dementia-related support and education services, particularly respite care and day programs.
References
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
•Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
49.6K
Ítems de referencia para publicar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: La Declaración PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.
David Moher,Alessandro Liberati,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman,Grupo Prisma +4 more
- 01 Jan 2014
Abstract: David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
20.9K
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher,A. Liberati,J. Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman +3 more
TL;DR: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are crucial in healthcare, informing clinical practice guidelines and research funding decisions, but their value depends on transparent and clear reporting, highlighting the need for standardized guidelines like the PRISMA statement.
20.1K
•Journal Article
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher,A. Liberati,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman test,Gerd Antes,David C. Atkins,Virginia Barbour,Nick Barrowman,Jesse A. Berlin,Jocalyn Clark,Mike Clarke,Deborah J. Cook,Roberto D'Amico,Jonathan J Deeks,Philip J. Devereaux,Kay Dickersin,Matthias Egger,E Ernst,Peter C. Gøtzsche,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,G. H. Guyatt,Julian P T Higgins,Ioannidis Jpa.,Jos Kleijnen,Tom Lang,Nicola Magrini,D McNamee,Lorenzo Moja,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Maryann Napoli,Andrew D Oxman,B Pham,Drummond Rennie,Margaret Sampson,Kenneth F. Schulz,Paul G. Shekelle,David Tovey,Peter Tugwell +37 more
TL;DR: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) as discussed by the authors is an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
4.5K