Balancing Act

TL;DR: Work-life balance was negatively associated with work demands, turnover intentions and psychological strain, and positively associated with both family and job satisfaction, confirming the research hypotheses as discussed by the authors, and the structure, reliability and validity of this unidimensional, four-item measure was confirmed in four independent heterogeneous samples of workers employed in Australia and New Zealand.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors revisited and further developed Mitchell et al.'s (1997) theory of stakeholder identification and salience, and argued that urgency is not relevant for identifying stakeholders, and that it is primarily the moral legitimacy of the stakeholder's claim that applies to stakeholder salience.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a measure of work-life balance and tested whether work-lifetime balance is beneficial beyond conflict and enrichment for all employees, suggesting role balance as a theory for understanding how balance among roles can be beneficial for employees.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors employ a utilitarian moral standard and examine the apparent logical sequence behind the link between shareholder wealth maximization and social welfare, concluding that utilitarian criteria do not support the shareholder model; that is, shareholders wealth maximisation is only weakly linked to social welfare maximization.