Open AccessBook
Analyzing Microarray Gene Expression Data
Geoffrey J. McLachlan,Kim Anh Do,Christophe Ambroise +2 more
- 04 Aug 2004
875
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a supervised classification of Tissue Samples and linked the supervised classification with survival analysis, and showed that the classification of tissue samples is more accurate than that of microarray data.
read more
Abstract: Preface. 1. Microarrays in Gene Expression Studies. 2. Cleaning and Normalization. 3. Some Cluster Analysis Methods. 4. Clustering of Tissue Samples. 5. Screening and Clustering of Genes. 6. Discriminant Analysis. 7. Supervised Classification of Tissue Samples. 8. Linking Microarray Data with Survival Analysis. References. Author Index. Subject Index.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A methodology for the design of experiments in computational intelligence with multiple regression models
TL;DR: This paper focuses on the use of different Machine Learning approaches for regression tasks in the field of Computational Intelligence and especially on a correct comparison between the different results provided for different methods, as those techniques are complex systems that require further study to be fully understood.
36
Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with transient elastography (FibroScan®): applying the cut-offs of M probe to XL probe
Grace Lai-Hung Wong,Julien Vergniol,Peter Lo,Vincent Wai-Sun Wong,Juliette Foucher,Brigitte Le Bail,Paul Cheung-Lung Choi,Faiza Chermak,Kwong-Sak Leung,Wassil Merrouche,Henry Lik-Yuen Chan,Victor de Ledinghen +11 more
TL;DR: XL cut-offs probe for corresponding M cut-off were derived from an exploratory cohort, and subsequently validated in a cohort of 147 patients who underwent liver biopsy and overall accuracy was 89% among 62 patients whose LSM-XL < 4.8kPa or ≥ 10.7kPa.
35
Finding transcriptomics biomarkers for in vivo identification of (non-)genotoxic carcinogens using wild-type and Xpa/p53 mutant mouse models
Martijs J. Jonker,Oskar Bruning,Maarten van Iterson,Mirjam M. Schaap,Tessa V. van der Hoeven,Harry Vrieling,Rudolf B. Beems,Annemieke de Vries,Harry van Steeg,Harry van Steeg,Timo M. Breit,Mirjam Luijten +11 more
TL;DR: A proof-of-principle for the identification and use of transcriptomics biomarkers for GTXC or NGTXC is achieved, which supports the view that toxicogenomics with short-term in vivo exposure provides a viable tool for classifying (geno)toxic compounds.
35
An adaptive sampling method for global sensitivity analysis based on least-squares support vector regression
TL;DR: This study presents a novel adaptive sampling method based on a specific surrogate model, the least-squares support vector regresson, which improves the estimation of global sensitivity values, hence reducing the overall computational costs visibly.
35
Improving models of fine root carbon stocks and fluxes in European forests.
TL;DR: In this paper, a database of fine root biomass, necromass and production derived from 454 plots across European forests was updated and compared to estimates obtained from 19 different models, including climate, net primary production, foliage and above-ground biomass, leaf area index (LAI), latitude and/or land cover type.
34