Open Access
ANALYSIS Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale
Heather B. Jackson,Lenore Fahrig +1 more
- 01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: In this article, the authors conducted a quantitative review of multiscale studies to evaluate whether research has been conducted at the true scale of effect and found that observed scales of effect were strongly positively predicted by the smallest and largest scales evaluated by researchers.
read more
Abstract: Aim The spatial extent (scale) at which landscape attributes are measured has a strong impact on inferred species–landscape relationships. Consequently, researchers commonly measure landscape variables at multiple scales to select one scale (the ‘scale of effect’) that yields the strongest species–landscape relationship. Scales of effect observed in multiscale studies may not be true scales of effect if scales are arbitrarily selected and/or are too narrow in range. Miscalculation of the scale of effect may explain why the theoretical relationship between scale of effect and species traits, e.g. dispersal distance, is not empirically well supported. Location World-wide. Methods Using data from 583 species in 71 studies we conducted a quantitative review of multiscale studies to evaluate whether research has been conducted at the true scale of effect. Results Multiple lines of evidence indicated that multiscale studies are often conducted at suboptimal scales. We did not find convincing evidence of a relationship between observed scale of effect and any of 29 species traits. Instead, observed scales of effect were strongly positively predicted by the smallest and largest scales evaluated by researchers. Only 29% of studies reported biological reasons for the scales evaluated. Scales tended to be narrow in range (the mean range is 0.9 orders of magnitude) and few (the mean number of scales evaluated is four). Many species (44%) had observed scales of effect equal to the smallest or largest scale evaluated, suggesting a better scale was outside that range. Increasing the range of scales evaluated decreased the proportion of species with scales of effect equal to the smallest or largest scale evaluated.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
What determines the spatial extent of landscape effects on species
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive summary of the hypotheses concerning what determines the scale of effect, and provide predictions that can be tested in empirical studies, and show, with a review of the literature, that most of these predictions have so far been inadequately tested.
272
Urbanization drives cross-taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales.
Elena Piano,Elena Piano,Caroline Souffreau,Thomas Merckx,Thomas Merckx,Lisa F. Baardsen,Thierry Backeljau,Thierry Backeljau,Dries Bonte,Kristien I. Brans,Marie Cours,Maxime Dahirel,Maxime Dahirel,Nicolas Debortoli,Ellen Decaestecker,Katrien De Wolf,Katrien De Wolf,Jessie M. T. Engelen,Diego Fontaneto,Andros T. Gianuca,Andros T. Gianuca,Lynn Govaert,Lynn Govaert,Lynn Govaert,Fabio T. T. Hanashiro,Janet Higuti,Luc Lens,Koen Martens,Koen Martens,Hans Matheve,Erik Matthysen,Eveline Pinseel,Eveline Pinseel,Rose Sablon,Isa Schön,Isa Schön,Robby Stoks,Karine Van Doninck,Hans Van Dyck,Pieter Vanormelingen,Jeroen Van Wichelen,Jeroen Van Wichelen,Wim Vyverman,Luc De Meester,Frederik Hendrickx,Frederik Hendrickx +45 more
TL;DR: The results provide strong support to the general negative impact of urbanization on abundance and species richness within habitat patches and highlight the importance of considering multiple spatial scales and taxa to assess the impacts of urbanized biodiversity.
Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection probability is influenced by seasonal activity of organisms
TL;DR: EDNA was applied to survey for two highly imperiled species endemic to the upper Black Warrior River basin in Alabama, US and found that season strongly affected eDNA detection probability for both species, with N. alabamensis having higher e DNA detection probabilities during the cool season and S. depressus have higher eDNA Detection probability during the warm season.
Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: A cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species
Thomas Püttker,Renato Crouzeilles,Mauricio Almeida-Gomes,Marina Schmoeller,Daniel Maurenza,Helena Alves-Pinto,Helena Alves-Pinto,Renata Pardini,Marcus Vinícius Vieira,Cristina Banks-Leite,Carlos Fonseca,Jean Paul Metzger,Gustavo M. Accacio,Gustavo M. Accacio,Eduardo Roberto Alexandrino,Camila dos Santos de Barros,Juliano André Bogoni,Danilo Boscolo,Pedro H. S. Brancalion,Adriana A. Bueno,Elaine Cristina Barbosa Cambui,Gustavo Rodrigues Canale,Rui Cerqueira,Ricardo Gomes César,Gabriel Dalla Colletta,Ana Cláudia Delciellos,Marianna Dixo,Candelaria Estavillo,Carolina Franco Esteves,Fábio Falcão,Fabiano Turini Farah,Deborah Faria,Katia Maria Paschoaletto Micchi de Barros Ferraz,Silvio Frosini de Barros Ferraz,Patrícia Alves Ferreira,Maurício Eduardo Graipel,Carlos E. V. Grelle,Malva Isabel Medina Hernández,Natália Macedo Ivanauskas,Rudi Ricardo Laps,Inara R. Leal,Marília Mascarenhas Lima,Marília Bruzzi Lion,Marcelo Magioli,Luiz Fernando Silva Magnago,Julia R.A.S. Mangueira,Euvaldo Marciano-Jr,Eduardo Mariano-Neto,Márcia C. M. Marques,Sebastião Venâncio Martins,Marlla A. Matos,Fabio Antônio Ribeiro Matos,Jeanette I. Miachir,José M. Morante-Filho,José M. Morante-Filho,Natalie Olifiers,Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos,Mateus Luís Barradas Paciencia,Adriano Pereira Paglia,Marcelo Passamani,Carlos A. Peres,Clarissa Machado Pinto Leite,Tiago Jordão Porto,Luciano Carramaschi de Alagão Querido,Luciana Carvalho dos Reis,Andréia Alves Rezende,Dary Moreira Gonçalves Rigueira,Pedro Luís Bernardo da Rocha,Larissa Rocha-Santos,Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues,Rafael Alves dos Santos e Santos,Juliana Silveira dos Santos,Maxwell Souza Silveira,Marcelo Simonelli,Marcelo Tabarelli,Rodrigo Nogueira de Vasconcelos,Blandina Felipe Viana,Emerson M. Vieira,Jayme Augusto Prevedello +78 more
TL;DR: It is argued that dismissing habitat fragmentation as a powerful force driving species extinction in tropical forest landscapes is premature and unsafe.
146
Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis
TL;DR: In this paper , a comprehensive meta-analysis demonstrates the positive and significant effect on biodiversity of increasing landscape complexity in agricultural lands, potentially contributing to agriculture production, ecosystem resilience, and human well-being.
139
References
Towards a coherent allometric framework for individual home ranges, key population patches and geographic ranges
TL;DR: A quantitative meta-analysis and developed a minimal model, covering different types of spatial characteristics and several species groups, indicated that carnivores require more space than equally sized herbivores, while homeotherms occupy larger areas than heterotherms.
Investigating species-environment relationships at multiple scales: Differentiating between intrinsic scale and the modifiable areal unit problem
Alex M. Lechner,Alex M. Lechner,William T. Langford,Simon D. Jones,Sarah A. Bekessy,Ascelin Gordon +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the effect of spatial resolution of remote sensing environmental data on the identification of the intrinsic scale using multi-scale species-environment models and found that the errors in the intrinsic scales identified were close to the maximum value possible that could be measured by this experiment.
Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes
Mark E. Hostetler,C.S. Holling +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored how the variation in percent tree canopy cover, at four different scales, affected the abundance of bird species across various urban sites in North America and determined the area (called the best prediction area) and the patch size (called best patch size) that accounted for a significant amount of the variation of bird counts, beyond the variation accounted for by these parameters measured at other scales.
Determining the Spatial Scale of Species' Response to Habitat
TL;DR: A technique and accompanying software that use a focal patch approach to select multiple sets of spatially independent sites to determine the spatial scales at which 12 different species of cerambycid beetles respond to forest cover is developed.
Landscape context affects genetic diversity at a much larger spatial extent than population abundance
Nathan D. Jackson,Lenore Fahrig +1 more
TL;DR: The results suggest that managing protected species at spatial scales based on population abundance data may ignore broader landscape effects on population genetic diversity and persistence, lending support to the importance of managing large buffers surrounding areas of conservation concern.
Related Papers (5)
[...]