Journal Article10.1348/014466506X96931
An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Julie F Pallant,Alan Tennant +1 more
1K
TL;DR: The study demonstrates the usefulness of Rasch analysis in assessing the psychometric properties of a scale and suggests that further use of this technique to assess the HADS-14 in other clinical groups is warranted.
read more
Abstract: Objectives To demonstrate the use of Rasch analysis by assessing the appropriateness of utilizing the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) total score (HADS-14) as a measure of psychological distress.
Design Cross-sectional, using Rasch analysis.
Methods The HADS was administered to 296 patients attending an out-patient musculoskeletal rehabilitation program. Rasch analysis was conducted using RUMM2020 software to assess the overall fit of the model, the response scale used, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF) and person separation.
Results Rasch analysis supported the viability of the HADS-14 as a measure of psychological distress. It showed good person separation, little disordering of the thresholds and no evidence of DIF. One anxiety item (item 11) showed some misfit to the model. The residuals patterned into the two subscales (anxiety and depression), but the person estimate derived from these two subscales was not statistically different to that derived from all items taken together, supporting the assumption of unidimensionality. A cut-point of 12 on the HADS-14 identified all cases that were classified as both anxious and depressed on the original individual HADS subscales.
Conclusions The results of Rasch analysis support the use of the HADS-14 as a global measure of psychological distress. The study demonstrates the usefulness of Rasch analysis in assessing the psychometric properties of a scale and suggests that further use of this technique to assess the HADS-14 in other clinical groups is warranted.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Cross-cultural validity of the Spanish version of PHQ-9 among pregnant Peruvian women: A Rasch item response theory analysis
TL;DR: The authors evaluated the validity of the Spanish language version of the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression scale in a large sample of pregnant Peruvian women using Rasch item response theory (IRT) approaches.
Meaningful and Measurable Health Domains in Huntington's Disease: Large-Scale Validation of the Huntington's Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Across Severity Stages.
TL;DR: The HDQoL, with its 2 distinct behavioral domains of Mood-Self and Worries as well as the Physical-Functional and Cognitive domains, is a relevant, reliable, and valid patient-derived instrument to measure the impact of HD across all severity stages.
Maternal coping, appraisals and adjustment following diagnosis of fetal anomaly.
TL;DR: So far, associations between appraisals, maternal adjustment and coping following diagnosis of fetal anomaly have not been investigated in women who continue with their pregnancy.
An Initial Investigation of an Australian Adaptation of the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery — II
Kate Erin Jacobs,Shane Costello +1 more
TL;DR: The authors investigated the capacity for using the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery - II (MAB-II), a group-administered test of cognitive ability, to further Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) driven research in Australia.
Measuring compassionate healthcare with the 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale.
TL;DR: The current 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale demonstrates excellent psychometric properties by Classical Test Theory and Rasch measurement theory, and is a unidimensional scale with excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
References
•Book
Using multivariate statistics
Barbara G. Tabachnick,Linda S. Fidell +1 more
- 01 Jan 1983
TL;DR: In this Section: 1. Multivariate Statistics: Why? and 2. A Guide to Statistical Techniques: Using the Book Research Questions and Associated Techniques.
79.5K
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
A. S. Zigmond,R. P. Snaith +1 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that the introduction of the scales into general hospital practice would facilitate the large task of detection and management of emotional disorder in patients under investigation and treatment in medical and surgical departments.
41.8K
The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review
TL;DR: HADS was found to perform well in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients and in the general population.
9.7K
Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method
J M Bland,Douglas G. Altman test +1 more
TL;DR: A simulation of a clinical trial of the treatment of coronary artery disease by allocating 1073 patient records from past cases into two “treatment” groups at random failed to show any significant difference in survival between those patients allocated to the two treatments.
3.8K
Related Papers (5)
Trevor G. Bond,Christine M. Fox +1 more
- 01 Apr 2001