Open AccessPosted Content
Algorithmic Fairness
Dana Pessach,Erez Shmueli +1 more
TL;DR: An overview of the main concepts of identifying, measuring and improving algorithmic fairness when using AI algorithms is presented and the most commonly used fairness-related datasets in this field are described.
read more
Abstract: An increasing number of decisions regarding the daily lives of human beings are being controlled by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in spheres ranging from healthcare, transportation, and education to college admissions, recruitment, provision of loans and many more realms. Since they now touch on many aspects of our lives, it is crucial to develop AI algorithms that are not only accurate but also objective and fair. Recent studies have shown that algorithmic decision-making may be inherently prone to unfairness, even when there is no intention for it. This paper presents an overview of the main concepts of identifying, measuring and improving algorithmic fairness when using AI algorithms. The paper begins by discussing the causes of algorithmic bias and unfairness and the common definitions and measures for fairness. Fairness-enhancing mechanisms are then reviewed and divided into pre-process, in-process and post-process mechanisms. A comprehensive comparison of the mechanisms is then conducted, towards a better understanding of which mechanisms should be used in different scenarios. The paper then describes the most commonly used fairness-related datasets in this field. Finally, the paper ends by reviewing several emerging research sub-fields of algorithmic fairness.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Figures
Table 1. Measures and Definitions for Algorithmic Fairness 
Table 4. Additional Measures and Definitions for Algorithmic Fairness 
Fig. 1. If the SAT scores were used for hiring, then unprivileged candidates with high potential would be excluded, whereas lower potential candidates from the privileged group would be hired instead 
Table 3. Common Benchmark Datasets for Algorithmic Fairness 
Table 2. Pre-Process, In-Process and Post-Process Mechanisms for Algorithmic Fairness
Citations
Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward:
TL;DR: There is a substantial gap between the promise and reality of artificial intelligence in human resource (HR) management, and four challenges in using data science techniques for HR management are identified.
848
•Posted Content
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey.
Simon Caton,Christian Haas +1 more
TL;DR: An overview of the different schools of thought and approaches to mitigating (social) biases and increase fairness in the Machine Learning literature is provided, organises approaches into the widely accepted framework of pre-processing, in- processing, and post-processing methods, subcategorizing into a further 11 method areas.
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
TL;DR: It is shown how choices and assumptions made—often implicitly—to justify the use of prediction-based decision-making can raise fairness concerns and a notationally consistent catalog of fairness definitions from the literature is presented.
491
A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle
Harini Suresh,John V. Guttag +1 more
- 05 Oct 2021
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify seven potential sources of downstream harm in machine learning, spanning data collection, development, and deployment, and propose a framework to facilitate more productive and precise communication around these issues.
417
References
•Posted Content
Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
TL;DR: The authors discusses a fairness criterion originating in the field of educational and psychological testing that has recently been applied to assess the fairness of recidivism prediction instruments and demonstrate how adherence to the criterion may lead to considerable disparate impact when recidiv prevalence differs across groups.
661
•Posted Content
On Fairness and Calibration
TL;DR: This paper investigated the tension between minimizing error disparity across different population groups while maintaining calibrated probability estimates and showed that calibration is compatible only with a single error constraint (i.e. equal false negatives rates across groups).
•Proceedings Article
Fairness Constraints: Mechanisms for Fair Classification.
Muhammad Bilal Zafar,Isabel Valera,Manuel Gomez Rodriguez,Krishna P. Gummadi +3 more
- 10 Apr 2017
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce a flexible mechanism to design fair classifiers by leveraging a novel intuitive measure of decision boundary (un)fairness, and instantiate this mechanism with two well-known classifiers, logistic regression and support vector machines, and show on real-world data that their mechanism allows for a finegrained control on the degree of fairness, often at a small cost in terms of accuracy.
•Posted Content
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on the existing literatures in criminology, computer science and statistics to provide an integrated examination of fairness and accuracy in criminal justice risk assessments, and show that there are at least six kinds of fairness, some of which are incompatible with one another and with accuracy.
CVAE-GAN: Fine-Grained Image Generation through Asymmetric Training
Jianmin Bao,Dong Chen,Fang Wen,Houqiang Li,Gang Hua +4 more
- 29 Mar 2017
TL;DR: In this article, a variational generative adversarial network (GAN) is proposed to generate images in a specific category with randomly drawn values on a latent attribute vector, which can be applied to other tasks, such as image inpainting, super-resolution, and data augmentation for training better face recognition models.