Open AccessPosted Content
Algorithmic Fairness
Dana Pessach,Erez Shmueli +1 more
TL;DR: An overview of the main concepts of identifying, measuring and improving algorithmic fairness when using AI algorithms is presented and the most commonly used fairness-related datasets in this field are described.
read more
Abstract: An increasing number of decisions regarding the daily lives of human beings are being controlled by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in spheres ranging from healthcare, transportation, and education to college admissions, recruitment, provision of loans and many more realms. Since they now touch on many aspects of our lives, it is crucial to develop AI algorithms that are not only accurate but also objective and fair. Recent studies have shown that algorithmic decision-making may be inherently prone to unfairness, even when there is no intention for it. This paper presents an overview of the main concepts of identifying, measuring and improving algorithmic fairness when using AI algorithms. The paper begins by discussing the causes of algorithmic bias and unfairness and the common definitions and measures for fairness. Fairness-enhancing mechanisms are then reviewed and divided into pre-process, in-process and post-process mechanisms. A comprehensive comparison of the mechanisms is then conducted, towards a better understanding of which mechanisms should be used in different scenarios. The paper then describes the most commonly used fairness-related datasets in this field. Finally, the paper ends by reviewing several emerging research sub-fields of algorithmic fairness.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Figures
Table 1. Measures and Definitions for Algorithmic Fairness 
Table 4. Additional Measures and Definitions for Algorithmic Fairness 
Fig. 1. If the SAT scores were used for hiring, then unprivileged candidates with high potential would be excluded, whereas lower potential candidates from the privileged group would be hired instead 
Table 3. Common Benchmark Datasets for Algorithmic Fairness 
Table 2. Pre-Process, In-Process and Post-Process Mechanisms for Algorithmic Fairness
Citations
Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward:
TL;DR: There is a substantial gap between the promise and reality of artificial intelligence in human resource (HR) management, and four challenges in using data science techniques for HR management are identified.
848
•Posted Content
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey.
Simon Caton,Christian Haas +1 more
TL;DR: An overview of the different schools of thought and approaches to mitigating (social) biases and increase fairness in the Machine Learning literature is provided, organises approaches into the widely accepted framework of pre-processing, in- processing, and post-processing methods, subcategorizing into a further 11 method areas.
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
TL;DR: It is shown how choices and assumptions made—often implicitly—to justify the use of prediction-based decision-making can raise fairness concerns and a notationally consistent catalog of fairness definitions from the literature is presented.
491
A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle
Harini Suresh,John V. Guttag +1 more
- 05 Oct 2021
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify seven potential sources of downstream harm in machine learning, spanning data collection, development, and deployment, and propose a framework to facilitate more productive and precise communication around these issues.
417
References
The comparisons of data mining techniques for the predictive accuracy of probability of default of credit card clients
I-Cheng Yeh,Che-hui Lien +1 more
TL;DR: Among the six data mining techniques, artificial neural network is the only one that can accurately estimate the real probability of default, and its regression intercept is close to zero, and regression coefficient to one.
1K
Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification
Toon Calders,Sicco Verwer +1 more
TL;DR: Three approaches for making the naive Bayes classifier discrimination-free are presented: modifying the probability of the decision being positive, training one model for every sensitive attribute value and balancing them, and adding a latent variable to the Bayesian model that represents the unbiased label and optimizing the model parameters for likelihood using expectation maximization.
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
TL;DR: In this paper, a discussion of fairness in criminal justice risk assessments typically lacks conceptual precision. Rhetoric too often substitutes for careful analysis, and the authors seek to clarify this issue.
987
Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatment
Muhammad Bilal Zafar,Isabel Valera,Manuel Gomez Rodriguez,Krishna P. Gummadi +3 more
- 03 Apr 2017
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce a new notion of unfairness, disparate mistreatment, which is defined in terms of misclassification rates and then propose intuitive measures of disparate mistreating for decision boundary-based classifiers.
984
Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer
Toshihiro Kamishima,Shotaro Akaho,Hideki Asoh,Jun Sakuma +3 more
- 24 Sep 2012
TL;DR: A regularization approach is proposed that is applicable to any prediction algorithm with probabilistic discriminative models and applied to logistic regression and empirically show its effectiveness and efficiency.