Open AccessPosted Content
Algorithmic Fairness
Dana Pessach,Erez Shmueli +1 more
TL;DR: An overview of the main concepts of identifying, measuring and improving algorithmic fairness when using AI algorithms is presented and the most commonly used fairness-related datasets in this field are described.
read more
Abstract: An increasing number of decisions regarding the daily lives of human beings are being controlled by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in spheres ranging from healthcare, transportation, and education to college admissions, recruitment, provision of loans and many more realms. Since they now touch on many aspects of our lives, it is crucial to develop AI algorithms that are not only accurate but also objective and fair. Recent studies have shown that algorithmic decision-making may be inherently prone to unfairness, even when there is no intention for it. This paper presents an overview of the main concepts of identifying, measuring and improving algorithmic fairness when using AI algorithms. The paper begins by discussing the causes of algorithmic bias and unfairness and the common definitions and measures for fairness. Fairness-enhancing mechanisms are then reviewed and divided into pre-process, in-process and post-process mechanisms. A comprehensive comparison of the mechanisms is then conducted, towards a better understanding of which mechanisms should be used in different scenarios. The paper then describes the most commonly used fairness-related datasets in this field. Finally, the paper ends by reviewing several emerging research sub-fields of algorithmic fairness.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Figures
Table 1. Measures and Definitions for Algorithmic Fairness 
Table 4. Additional Measures and Definitions for Algorithmic Fairness 
Fig. 1. If the SAT scores were used for hiring, then unprivileged candidates with high potential would be excluded, whereas lower potential candidates from the privileged group would be hired instead 
Table 3. Common Benchmark Datasets for Algorithmic Fairness 
Table 2. Pre-Process, In-Process and Post-Process Mechanisms for Algorithmic Fairness
Citations
Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward:
TL;DR: There is a substantial gap between the promise and reality of artificial intelligence in human resource (HR) management, and four challenges in using data science techniques for HR management are identified.
848
•Posted Content
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey.
Simon Caton,Christian Haas +1 more
TL;DR: An overview of the different schools of thought and approaches to mitigating (social) biases and increase fairness in the Machine Learning literature is provided, organises approaches into the widely accepted framework of pre-processing, in- processing, and post-processing methods, subcategorizing into a further 11 method areas.
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
TL;DR: It is shown how choices and assumptions made—often implicitly—to justify the use of prediction-based decision-making can raise fairness concerns and a notationally consistent catalog of fairness definitions from the literature is presented.
491
A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle
Harini Suresh,John V. Guttag +1 more
- 05 Oct 2021
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify seven potential sources of downstream harm in machine learning, spanning data collection, development, and deployment, and propose a framework to facilitate more productive and precise communication around these issues.
417
References
•Posted Content
Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddings
TL;DR: This article developed a technique for understanding the origins of bias in word embeddings by identifying how perturbing the corpus will affect the bias of the resulting embedding, which can be used to trace the origin of word embedding bias back to the original training documents.
•Posted Content
Fair Pipelines
Amanda Bower,Sarah N. Kitchen,Laura Niss,Martin J. Strauss,Alexander Vargas,Suresh Venkatasubramanian +5 more
TL;DR: This work facilitates ensuring fairness of machine learning in the real world by decoupling fairness considerations in compound decisions by studying how fairness propagates through a compound decision-making processes, which it is called a pipeline.
Game theory, on-line prediction and boosting
Yoav Freund,Robert E. Schapire +1 more
- 01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: An algorithm for learning to play repeated games based on the on-line prediction methods of Littlestone and Warmuth is described, which yields a simple proof of von Neumann’s famous minmax theorem, as well as a provable method of approximately solving a game.
Did the Results of Promotion Exams Have a Disparate Impact on Minorities? Using Statistical Evidence in Ricci v. DeStefano
TL;DR: In this article, the Ricci v. DeStefano case was used to study the disparate impact of firefighters' promotion exams in New Haven, Connecticut and showed that there is significant difference between the average test scores of minority and majority applicants.
Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatment
TL;DR: A new notion of unfairness, disparate mistreatment, is introduced, defined in terms of misclassification rates, which is proposed for decision boundary-based classifiers and can be easily incorporated into their formulation as convex-concave constraints.