Open AccessPosted Content
Algorithmic Fairness
Dana Pessach,Erez Shmueli +1 more
TL;DR: An overview of the main concepts of identifying, measuring and improving algorithmic fairness when using AI algorithms is presented and the most commonly used fairness-related datasets in this field are described.
read more
Abstract: An increasing number of decisions regarding the daily lives of human beings are being controlled by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in spheres ranging from healthcare, transportation, and education to college admissions, recruitment, provision of loans and many more realms. Since they now touch on many aspects of our lives, it is crucial to develop AI algorithms that are not only accurate but also objective and fair. Recent studies have shown that algorithmic decision-making may be inherently prone to unfairness, even when there is no intention for it. This paper presents an overview of the main concepts of identifying, measuring and improving algorithmic fairness when using AI algorithms. The paper begins by discussing the causes of algorithmic bias and unfairness and the common definitions and measures for fairness. Fairness-enhancing mechanisms are then reviewed and divided into pre-process, in-process and post-process mechanisms. A comprehensive comparison of the mechanisms is then conducted, towards a better understanding of which mechanisms should be used in different scenarios. The paper then describes the most commonly used fairness-related datasets in this field. Finally, the paper ends by reviewing several emerging research sub-fields of algorithmic fairness.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Figures
Table 1. Measures and Definitions for Algorithmic Fairness 
Table 4. Additional Measures and Definitions for Algorithmic Fairness 
Fig. 1. If the SAT scores were used for hiring, then unprivileged candidates with high potential would be excluded, whereas lower potential candidates from the privileged group would be hired instead 
Table 3. Common Benchmark Datasets for Algorithmic Fairness 
Table 2. Pre-Process, In-Process and Post-Process Mechanisms for Algorithmic Fairness
Citations
Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward:
TL;DR: There is a substantial gap between the promise and reality of artificial intelligence in human resource (HR) management, and four challenges in using data science techniques for HR management are identified.
848
•Posted Content
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey.
Simon Caton,Christian Haas +1 more
TL;DR: An overview of the different schools of thought and approaches to mitigating (social) biases and increase fairness in the Machine Learning literature is provided, organises approaches into the widely accepted framework of pre-processing, in- processing, and post-processing methods, subcategorizing into a further 11 method areas.
Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
TL;DR: It is shown how choices and assumptions made—often implicitly—to justify the use of prediction-based decision-making can raise fairness concerns and a notationally consistent catalog of fairness definitions from the literature is presented.
491
A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle
Harini Suresh,John V. Guttag +1 more
- 05 Oct 2021
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify seven potential sources of downstream harm in machine learning, spanning data collection, development, and deployment, and propose a framework to facilitate more productive and precise communication around these issues.
417
References
•Posted Content
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
TL;DR: This work empirically demonstrates that its algorithms significantly reduce gender bias in embeddings while preserving the its useful properties such as the ability to cluster related concepts and to solve analogy tasks.
2.6K
Testing Statistical Hypotheses
George Casella,Ingram Olkin,Stephen E. Fienberg +2 more
- 01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: This classic textbook, now available from Springer, summarizes developments in the field of hypotheses testing and indicates that optimality considerations continue to provide the organizing principle, but they are now tempered by a much stronger emphasis on the robustness properties of the resulting procedures.
2.4K
Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments
Alexandra Chouldechova
- 01 Jun 2017
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that the criteria cannot all be simultaneously satisfied when recidivism prevalence differs across groups, and how disparate impact can arise when an RPI fails to satisfy the criterion of error rate balance.
2.3K
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Michael Feldman,Sorelle A. Friedler,John Moeller,Carlos Scheidegger,Suresh Venkatasubramanian +4 more
- 10 Aug 2015
TL;DR: This work links disparate impact to a measure of classification accuracy that while known, has received relatively little attention and proposes a test for disparate impact based on how well the protected class can be predicted from the other attributes.
•Posted Content
The information bottleneck method
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define the relevant information in a signal as being the information that this signal provides about another signal, and they formalize this problem as that of finding a short code for a signal that preserves the maximum information about the other signal.
2K