Journal Article10.3390/app14146302
Adaptive Mask-Based Interpretable Convolutional Neural Network (AMI-CNN) for Modulation Format Identification
Xiyue Zhu,Yu Cheng,Jiafeng He,Juan Guo +3 more
TL;DR: An Adaptive Mask-Based Interpretable Convolutional Neural Network (AMI-CNN) that utilizes a mask structure for feature selection during neural network training and feeds the selected features into the classifier for decision making is proposed.
read more
Abstract: Recently, various deep learning methods have been applied to Modulation Format Identification (MFI). The interpretability of deep learning models is important. However, this interpretability is challenged due to the black-box nature of deep learning. To deal with this difficulty, we propose an Adaptive Mask-Based Interpretable Convolutional Neural Network (AMI-CNN) that utilizes a mask structure for feature selection during neural network training and feeds the selected features into the classifier for decision making. During training, the masks are updated dynamically with parameters to optimize feature selection. The extracted mask serves as interpretable weights, with each weight corresponding to a feature, reflecting the contribution of each feature to the model’s decision. We validate the model on two datasets—Power Spectral Density (PSD) and constellation phase histogram—and compare it with three classical interpretable methods: Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The MSE values are as follows: AMI-CNN achieves the lowest MSE of 0.0246, followed by SHAP with 0.0547, LIME with 0.0775, and Grad-CAM with 0.1995. Additionally, AMI-CNN achieves the highest PG-Acc of 1, whether on PSD or on constellation phase histogram. Experimental results demonstrate that the AMI-CNN model outperforms compared methods in both qualitative and quantitative analyses.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Marco Tulio Ribeiro,Sameer Singh,Carlos Guestrin +2 more
- 13 Aug 2016
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose LIME, a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant way, framing the task as a submodular optimization problem.
Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks
Matthew D. Zeiler,Rob Fergus +1 more
- 06 Sep 2014
TL;DR: A novel visualization technique is introduced that gives insight into the function of intermediate feature layers and the operation of the classifier in large Convolutional Network models, used in a diagnostic role to find model architectures that outperform Krizhevsky et al on the ImageNet classification benchmark.
16.6K
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju,Michael Cogswell,Abhishek Das,Ramakrishna Vedantam,Devi Parikh,Dhruv Batra +5 more
- 01 Oct 2017
TL;DR: This work combines existing fine-grained visualizations to create a high-resolution class-discriminative visualization, Guided Grad-CAM, and applies it to image classification, image captioning, and visual question answering (VQA) models, including ResNet-based architectures.
14.7K
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Amina Adadi,Mohammed Berrada +1 more
TL;DR: This survey provides an entry point for interested researchers and practitioners to learn key aspects of the young and rapidly growing body of research related to XAI, and review the existing approaches regarding the topic, discuss trends surrounding its sphere, and present major research trajectories.
3.2K
Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning.
TL;DR: The authors define interpretability in the context of machine learning and introduce the predictive, descriptive, relevant (PDR) framework for discussing interpretations, with three overarching desiderata for evaluation: predictive accuracy, descriptive accuracy, and relevancy, with relevance judged relative to a human audience.