Journal Article10.1007/s11831-024-10064-z
Active Learning and Bayesian Optimization: A Unified Perspective to Learn with a Goal
Francesco Di Fiore,Michela Nardelli,Laura Mainini +2 more
TL;DR: Active learning and Bayesian optimization are unified as symbiotic adaptive sampling methodologies driven by common principles.
read more
Abstract: Abstract Science and Engineering applications are typically associated with expensive optimization problem to identify optimal design solutions and states of the system of interest. Bayesian optimization and active learning compute surrogate models through efficient adaptive sampling schemes to assist and accelerate this search task toward a given optimization goal. Both those methodologies are driven by specific infill/learning criteria which quantify the utility with respect to the set goal of evaluating the objective function for unknown combinations of optimization variables. While the two fields have seen an exponential growth in popularity in the past decades, their dualism and synergy have received relatively little attention to date. This paper discusses and formalizes the synergy between Bayesian optimization and active learning as symbiotic adaptive sampling methodologies driven by common principles. In particular, we demonstrate this unified perspective through the formalization of the analogy between the Bayesian infill criteria and active learning criteria as driving principles of both the goal-driven procedures. To support our original perspective, we propose a general classification of adaptive sampling techniques to highlight similarities and differences between the vast families of adaptive sampling, active learning, and Bayesian optimization. Accordingly, the synergy is demonstrated mapping the Bayesian infill criteria with the active learning criteria, and is formalized for searches informed by both a single information source and multiple levels of fidelity. In addition, we provide guidelines to apply those learning criteria investigating the performance of different Bayesian schemes for a variety of benchmark problems to highlight benefits and limitations over mathematical properties that characterize real-world applications.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Figures

Fig. 9 Rastrigin function shifted and rotated benchmark problem 
Fig. 10 Paciorek function benchmark problem 
Fig. 11 Performances of the competing algorithms for the Forrester and Jump Forrester benchmarks 
Fig. 12 Performances of the competing algorithms for the Rosenbrock benchmarks 
Fig. 1 Citations of Bayesian Optimization (BO), Active Learning (AL), Adaptive Sampling (AS) and the three terms combined (BO+AL+AS) 
Fig. 7 Rosenbrock function benchmark problem over the D = 2 dimensional domain
Citations
A Scoping Review on Simulation-based Design Optimization in Marine Engineering: Trends, Best Practices, and Gaps
Andrea Serani,Thomas Scholcz,Valentina Vanzi +2 more
- 29 Apr 2024
TL;DR: This scoping review of 277 studies on simulation-based design optimization in marine engineering identifies trends, methodologies, and gaps, highlighting the need for more efficient and robust multidisciplinary optimization methods to address complex marine challenges.
6
Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science
Gary Tom,Stefan P. Schmid,Sterling G. Baird,Yang Cao,Kourosh Darvish,Han Hao,Stanley Lo,Sergio Pablo‐García,Ella Miray Rajaonson,Marta Skreta,N. Yoshikawa,Samantha Corapi,Gun Deniz Akkoc,Felix Strieth‐Kalthoff,Martin Seifrid,Alán Aspuru‐Guzik +15 more
- 18 Jun 2024
TL;DR: Self-driving laboratories accelerate research in chemistry and materials science by automating experimental workflows and autonomizing experiment planning.
3
Optimal Molecular Design: Generative Active Learning Combining REINVENT with Absolute Binding Free Energy Simulations
Hannes H. Loeffler,Shunzhou Wan,Marco Klähn,Agastya P. Bhati,Peter V. Coveney +4 more
- 26 Apr 2024
TL;DR: Generative active learning protocol combining generative molecular AI and absolute binding free energy simulations discovers novel ligands for target proteins.
1
Automated navigation of condensate phase behavior with active machine learning
Yannick H. A. Leurs,Willem van den Hout,Andrea Gardin,Joost L. J. van Dongen,Andoni Rodriguez‐Abetxuko,Nadia A. Erkamp,Jan C. M. van Hest,Francesca Grisoni,Luc Brunsveld,Yannick H. A. Leurs,Willem van den Hout,Andrea Gardin,Joost L. J. van Dongen,Andoni Rodriguez‐Abetxuko,Nadia A. Erkamp,Jan C. M. van Hest,Francesca Grisoni,Luc Brunsveld +17 more
TL;DR: Researchers developed an automated platform combining pipetting, confocal imaging, and active machine learning to rapidly map multidimensional phase diagrams of biomolecular condensates, providing detailed insights into condensate properties and phase behavior.
Urea electrosynthesis from gaseous nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide: A review
Yifan Zhou,Changrui Feng,Chenghan Sun,Zekun Chen,Shuying Li,Yuxia Jin,Rui Yang,Abuliti Abudula,Guoqing Guan,Yifan Zhou,Changrui Feng,Chenghan Sun,Zekun Chen,Shuying Li,Yuxia Jin,Rui Yang,Abuliti Abudula,Guoqing Guan +17 more
References
Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions
TL;DR: This paper introduces the reader to a response surface methodology that is especially good at modeling the nonlinear, multimodal functions that often occur in engineering and shows how these approximating functions can be used to construct an efficient global optimization algorithm with a credible stopping rule.
Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization
Bobak Shahriari,Kevin Swersky,Ziyu Wang,Ryan P. Adams,Nando de Freitas +4 more
- 01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: This review paper introduces Bayesian optimization, highlights some of its methodological aspects, and showcases a wide range of applications.
•Book
Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide
Alexander I. J. Forrester,András Sóbester,Andy J. Keane +2 more
- 02 Sep 2008
TL;DR: This chapter discusses the design and exploration of a Surrogate-based kriging model, and some of the techniques used in that process, as well as some new approaches to designing models based on the data presented.
2.8K
A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces
TL;DR: This paper presents a taxonomy of existing approaches for using response surfaces for global optimization, illustrating each method with a simple numerical example that brings out its advantages and disadvantages.