Academic Procrastination in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review
TL;DR: In this article, the authors carried out a scoping review of the empirical publications focused on academic procrastination in children and adolescents and identified relevant publications up to 2022, including grey literature.
read more
Abstract: Academic procrastination is a persistent behavior in students’ academic development consisting of postponing or delaying the completion of necessary tasks and having a deadline for completion, which is associated with detriment in performance, school dropout, and loss of student well-being. The largest body of existing knowledge on this behavior comes from studies conducted with university students, although it is necessary to deepen the findings obtained at lower educational levels. The aim of this work has been to carry out a scoping review of the empirical publications focused on academic procrastination in children and adolescents. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are detailed following the general guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute. However, some modifications are incorporated in the flowchart to guide the review sequence. The search was conducted in eleven thematic (ERIC, MedLine, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycINFO, PubPsych, and Teacher Reference Center) and multidisciplinary databases (Academic Search Ultimate, E-Journals, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science) to identify relevant publications up to 2022, including grey literature. Out of the initial 1185 records screened, a total of 79 records were selected. The search results included a total of 79 records. The most used assessment instruments, the most studied variables, and the type of design and sources of information used in the selected studies are detailed. Cultural aspects that open new lines of future research are identified.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Interventions to reduce academic procrastination: A systematic review
María Rosa Salguero-Pazos,Salvador Reyes-de-Cózar +1 more
TL;DR: This systematic review (n=32 studies) synthesizes educational interventions to reduce academic procrastination, highlighting self-regulation as a central dimension, and identifies gaps in research on personality and anxiety factors.
15
Cultural Competence Interventions in European Healthcare: A Scoping Review
Berta De-María,Gabriela Topa,Mario López-González +2 more
- 17 May 2024
TL;DR: Cultural competence interventions in European healthcare are not widely adopted. There is significant heterogeneity in the conception and operationalization of cultural competence models and interventions. Future research is needed to contribute to the conceptual development of cultural competence and design programs tailored to European superdiversity.
7
Characteristics of RCTs focusing on health promotion in community samples: a scoping review protocol based on the d-CoSPICO framework
M. Angeles López-González,Francisco Rodríguez-Cifuentes,Fernando Rubio-Garay,Luis Ángel Saúl +3 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors present a methodology for carrying out a scoping review that maps available evidence on randomised controlled trials focusing on health promotion intervention programs, which is expected to be completed in 2023.
The Impact of Islamic Religious Learning and Social Media Distraction on Procrastination Behavior in Higher Education : Does the Screen Time Mediation Matter?
Novia Eka Pratiwi,Muhammad Heriyudanta,Rihab Wit Daryono +2 more
TL;DR: This study examines the impact of Islamic learning and social media distraction on academic procrastination, finding that social media distraction significantly increases procrastination, while Islamic learning has no effect, and screen time mediates the relationship between the two.
1
References
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Andrea C. Tricco,Erin Lillie,Wasifa Zarin,Kelly K O'Brien,Heather Colquhoun,Danielle Levac,David Moher,Micah D J Peters,Tanya Horsley,Laura Weeks,Susanne Hempel,Elie A. Akl,Christine Chang,Jessie McGowan,Lesley A. Stewart,Lisa Hartling,Adrian Aldcroft,Michael G. Wilson,Chantelle Garritty,Simon Lewin,Christina Godfrey,Marilyn Macdonald,Etienne V. Langlois,Karla Soares-Weiser,Jo Moriarty,Tammy Clifford,Özge Tunçalp,Sharon E. Straus +27 more
TL;DR: A PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was needed to provide reporting guidance for this specific type of knowledge synthesis and was developed according to published guidance by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) Network for the development of reporting guidelines.
The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.
TL;DR: Strong and consistent predictors of procrastination were task aversiveness, task delay, self-efficacy, and impulsiveness, as well as conscientiousness and its facets of self-control, distractibility, organization, and achievement motivation.
Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control : If you feel bad, do it!
TL;DR: Three experiments found that believing that one's bad mood was frozen (unchangeable) eliminated the tendency to eat fattening snacks, seek immediate gratification, and engage in frivolous procrastination during emotional distress.
At last, my research article on procrastination.
TL;DR: In this article, a general form (G) of a true-false procrastination scale was created, which was based on an earlier version of the scale containing parallel forms A and B.
1.1K
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
TL;DR: The aim is to provide a typology of review types and describe key elements that need to be addressed during question development for each type and provide clarified guidance for both novice and experienced reviewers and a unified typology with respect to review types.