Open Access
Academic Dishonesty and Testing: How Student Beliefs and Test Settings Impact Decisions to Cheat
Jarret M Dyer,Heidi C Pettyjohn,Steve Saladin +2 more
- 01 Jan 2020
TL;DR: In this paper, Dyer and Saladin discuss how student beliefs and test settings impact decisions to cheat and how to detect cheating students in a test setup, and the importance of test settings in academic dishonesty.
read more
Abstract: Jarret M. Dyer is Coordinator, Specialized Testing and Co-Chair, Academic Integrity at College of DuPage. Email: dyerja@cod.edu Heidi Pettyjohn is the Executive Director of Accessibility at University of Cincinnati. Email: heidi.pettyjohn@uc.edu Steve Saladin is Professor of Psychology and the Director of Testing & Assessment at University of Idaho. E-mail: ssaladin@uidaho.edu Academic Dishonesty and Testing: How Student Beliefs and Test Settings Impact Decisions to Cheat
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring
Seife Dendir,R. Stockton Maxwell +1 more
- 01 Aug 2020
TL;DR: In this article, a quasi-experiment was conducted in which online proctoring using a webcam recording software was introduced for high-stakes exams in two online courses and the results showed that cheating took place in the online courses before and after the introduction of online pro-ctoring.
218
•Book Chapter
School belonging and school misconduct: the differing role of teacher and peer attachment
Jannick Demanet,Mieke Van Houtte +1 more
- 01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: Demanet and Van Houtte as mentioned in this paper found more support for the theory that individual bonding with teachers and peers results in more success and less misconduct than school cohesion, and that the more students perceive that teachers are supportive and that they belong to a peer group, the less likely they are to engage in misconduct.
138
Good Proctor or "Big Brother"? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a sustained moral philosophical analysis of online exam supervision technologies, focusing on ethical notions of academic integrity, fairness, non-maleficence, transparency, privacy, autonomy, liberty, and trust.
Online exam proctoring technologies: Educational innovation or deterioration?
Kyungmee Lee,Mik Fanguy +1 more
TL;DR: In this article , the authors conducted a qualitative case study in a large-sized, top-tier university in South Korea to investigate the negative impacts of adopting online exam proctoring technologies on student subjectivities, pedagogical relationships and educational outcomes.
110
Perceived seriousness of academic cheating behaviors among undergraduate students: an Ethiopian experience
TL;DR: In this paper, a study was conducted to examine perceived seriousness of academic cheating behaviors among undergraduate students in an Ethiopian University, where a total of 245 regular undergraduate students were randomly selected from three colleges: business and economics, natural and computational science, and social science found in a university.
References
College cheating: Ten years later
George M. Diekhoff,Emily E. LaBeff,Robert E. Clark,Larry E. Williams,Billy Francis,Valerie J. Haines +5 more
TL;DR: In a follow-up study of student cheating, this article surveyed 474 university students to evaluate the extent of cheating, assess attitudes toward cheating, identify variables that discriminate between cheaters and non-cheaters, assess the relative effectiveness of various deterrents to cheating, and examine changes in cheating attitudes and behaviors from 1984 to 1994.
274
Why Do College Students Cheat
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report the results of a study that applied the theory of reasoned action and partial least squares methodology to analyze the responses of 144 students to a survey on cheating behavior and found that approximately 60% of the business students and 64% of non-business students admitted to cheating behavior.
264
Can We Control Cheating in the Classroom
Joe Kerkvliet,Charles L. Sigmund +1 more
TL;DR: Can we control cheating in the classroom? as mentioned in this paper discusses the problem of cheating in education and proposes a solution to prevent cheating in classes. But, the solution is limited and time-consuming.
198
Engineering Students' Perceptions of and Attitudes Towards Cheating
Donald D. Carpenter,Trevor S. Harding,Cynthia J. Finelli,Susan M. Montgomery,Honor J. Passow +4 more
TL;DR: The PACES-1 Survey as mentioned in this paper was conducted to investigate what students and faculty perceive as cheating and to use this knowledge to help instructors and institutions increase the level of academic integrity among students.
‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey
Tracey Bretag,Saadia Mahmud,Margaret Wallace,Ruth Walker,Ursula McGowan,Julianne East,Margaret Green,Lee Partridge,Colin James +8 more
TL;DR: The results of a large online student survey (n = 15,304) on academic integrity at six Australian universities, indicate that a majority of respondents reported a good awareness of academic integrity and knowledge about academic integrity policy at their university and were satisfied with the information and support they receive.
183