1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "A western dietary pattern increases prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis" ?
In addition, the “ Carbohydrate pattern ”, which was analyzed in four articles, was positively associated with a higher PC risk ( OR = 1. 64 ; 95 % CI: 1. 35–2. 00 ).. The small number of studies included in the meta-analysis suggests that further investigation is necessary to support these findings.
read more
2. What was the effect of omitting the study of Niclis et al?
Of note, omitting the study of Niclis et al. [33], in the Western pattern, resulted in the absence of publication bias, as evidenced by both Egger’s regression (p = 0.089) and Begg’s rank correlation (p = 0.586) tests.
read more
3. What is the main limitation of meta-analysis?
One of the great limitations of meta-analysis is that the results are combined from studies conducted with different methods in different populations, resulting in heterogeneity.
read more
4. What was the summary OR for the Western diet?
The summary OR for the Western diet was 1.003 (95% CI: 1.001, 1.006; p = 0.021) with always high evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 73.7%, p = 0.001).
read more





