Open AccessPosted Content
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Scott M. Lundberg,Su-In Lee +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a unified framework for interpreting predictions, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), is presented, which assigns each feature an importance value for a particular prediction.
read more
Abstract: Understanding why a model makes a certain prediction can be as crucial as the prediction's accuracy in many applications. However, the highest accuracy for large modern datasets is often achieved by complex models that even experts struggle to interpret, such as ensemble or deep learning models, creating a tension between accuracy and interpretability. In response, various methods have recently been proposed to help users interpret the predictions of complex models, but it is often unclear how these methods are related and when one method is preferable over another. To address this problem, we present a unified framework for interpreting predictions, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). SHAP assigns each feature an importance value for a particular prediction. Its novel components include: (1) the identification of a new class of additive feature importance measures, and (2) theoretical results showing there is a unique solution in this class with a set of desirable properties. The new class unifies six existing methods, notable because several recent methods in the class lack the proposed desirable properties. Based on insights from this unification, we present new methods that show improved computational performance and/or better consistency with human intuition than previous approaches.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Evaluating local explanation methods on ground truth
TL;DR: An approach that allows to measure to which extent the explanations returned by local explanation methods are correct with respect to a synthetic ground truth explanation is proposed and enables the generation of synthetic transparent classifiers for which the reason for the decision taken is available by design.
89
An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Predictor for Early Detection of Sepsis.
Meicheng Yang,Chengyu Liu,Xingyao Wang,Yuwen Li,Hongxiang Gao,Xing Liu,Jianqing Li,Jianqing Li +7 more
TL;DR: An explainable artificial intelligence model for early predicting sepsis by analyzing the electronic health record data from ICU provided by the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 and achieves superior performance for predictingSepsis risk in a real-time way and provides interpretable information for understanding sepsi risk in ICU.
88
Pairwise acquisition prediction with SHAP value interpretation
TL;DR: This model proposed including a network feature that represented the importance of an acquirer and an acquiree in the investment and category networks, as well as a company relation feature associated with their similarity and closeness, found that the newly considered network and company relation features had high significance.
88
Fairway: A Way to Build Fair ML Software
TL;DR: This work explains how ground-truth bias in training data affects machine learning model fairness and how to find that bias in AI software, and proposes a method Fairway which combines pre-processing and in-processing approach to remove ethical bias from training data and trained model.
87
Understanding machine learning software defect predictions
Geanderson Esteves,Eduardo Figueiredo,Adriano Veloso,Markos Viggiato,Nivio Ziviani +4 more
- 01 Dec 2020
TL;DR: A tree boosting algorithm is used that receives as input a training set comprising records of easy-to-compute characteristics of each module and outputs whether the corresponding module is defect-prone, and a simple model sampling approach is proposed that finds accurate models with the minimum set of features.
87
References
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Marco Tulio Ribeiro,Sameer Singh,Carlos Guestrin +2 more
- 13 Aug 2016
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose LIME, a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant way, framing the task as a submodular optimization problem.
A Value for n-person Games
Lloyd S. Shapley
- 18 Mar 1952
TL;DR: In this paper, an examination of elementary properties of a value for the essential case is presented, which is deduced from a set of three axioms, having simple intuitive interpretations.
•Posted Content
Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences
TL;DR: DeepLIFT as mentioned in this paper decomposes the output prediction of a neural network on a specific input by backpropagating the contributions of all neurons in the network to every feature of the input.
2.3K
Monotonic solutions of cooperative games
TL;DR: In this article, the Shapley value for cooperative games is characterized and shown to be monotonic in the sense that if a game changes so that some player's contribution to all coalitions increases or stays the same then the player's allocation should not decrease.
931
•Posted Content
Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences
TL;DR: DeepLIFT (Learning Important FeaTures), an efficient and effective method for computing importance scores in a neural network that compares the activation of each neuron to its 'reference activation' and assigns contribution scores according to the difference.
Related Papers (5)
Tianqi Chen,Carlos Guestrin +1 more
- 13 Aug 2016
[...]
Leo Breiman
- 01 Oct 2001