Open AccessPosted Content
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Scott M. Lundberg,Su-In Lee +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a unified framework for interpreting predictions, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), is presented, which assigns each feature an importance value for a particular prediction.
read more
Abstract: Understanding why a model makes a certain prediction can be as crucial as the prediction's accuracy in many applications. However, the highest accuracy for large modern datasets is often achieved by complex models that even experts struggle to interpret, such as ensemble or deep learning models, creating a tension between accuracy and interpretability. In response, various methods have recently been proposed to help users interpret the predictions of complex models, but it is often unclear how these methods are related and when one method is preferable over another. To address this problem, we present a unified framework for interpreting predictions, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). SHAP assigns each feature an importance value for a particular prediction. Its novel components include: (1) the identification of a new class of additive feature importance measures, and (2) theoretical results showing there is a unique solution in this class with a set of desirable properties. The new class unifies six existing methods, notable because several recent methods in the class lack the proposed desirable properties. Based on insights from this unification, we present new methods that show improved computational performance and/or better consistency with human intuition than previous approaches.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Explaining black-box classifiers using post-hoc explanations-by-example: The effect of explanations and error-rates in XAI user studies
TL;DR: A post-hoc explanation-by-example approach to eXplainable AI (XAI), where a black-box, deep learning system is explained by reference to a more transparent, proxy model based on a feature-weighting analysis of the former that is used to find explanatory cases from the latter (as one instance of the so-called Twin Systems approach).
177
Prediction and Risk Stratification of Kidney Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy.
Tingyu Chen,Tingyu Chen,Xiang Li,Yingxue Li,Eryu Xia,Yong Qin,Shaoshan Liang,Feng Xu,Dandan Liang,Caihong Zeng,Zhihong Liu,Zhihong Liu +11 more
TL;DR: A prediction model using routinely available characteristics and based on the combination of a machine learning algorithm and survival analysis can stratify risk for kidney disease progression in the setting of IgAN.
173
Doctor XAI: an ontology-based approach to black-box sequential data classification explanations
Cecilia Panigutti,Alan Perotti,Dino Pedreschi +2 more
- 27 Jan 2020
TL;DR: This paper focuses on explaining Doctor AI, a multilabel classifier which takes as input the clinical history of a patient in order to predict the next visit, and shows how exploiting the temporal dimension in the data and the domain knowledge encoded in the medical ontology improves the quality of the mined explanations.
173
A benchmark of machine learning approaches for credit score prediction
TL;DR: A benchmarking study of some of the most used credit risk scoring models to predict if a loan will be repaid in a P2P platform and deals with a class imbalance problem and leverage several classifiers among the mostused in the literature, which are based on different sampling techniques.
172
Deep learning for credit scoring: Do or don’t?
Björn Rafn Gunnarsson,Seppe vanden Broucke,Seppe vanden Broucke,Bart Baesens,Bart Baesens,María Óskarsdóttir,Wilfried Lemahieu +6 more
TL;DR: Deep learning algorithms do not seem to be appropriate models for credit scoring based on this comparison and XGBoost should be preferred over the other credit scoring methods considered here when classification performance is the main objective of credit scoring activities.
167
References
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Marco Tulio Ribeiro,Sameer Singh,Carlos Guestrin +2 more
- 13 Aug 2016
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose LIME, a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant way, framing the task as a submodular optimization problem.
A Value for n-person Games
Lloyd S. Shapley
- 18 Mar 1952
TL;DR: In this paper, an examination of elementary properties of a value for the essential case is presented, which is deduced from a set of three axioms, having simple intuitive interpretations.
•Posted Content
Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences
TL;DR: DeepLIFT as mentioned in this paper decomposes the output prediction of a neural network on a specific input by backpropagating the contributions of all neurons in the network to every feature of the input.
2.3K
Monotonic solutions of cooperative games
TL;DR: In this article, the Shapley value for cooperative games is characterized and shown to be monotonic in the sense that if a game changes so that some player's contribution to all coalitions increases or stays the same then the player's allocation should not decrease.
931
•Posted Content
Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences
TL;DR: DeepLIFT (Learning Important FeaTures), an efficient and effective method for computing importance scores in a neural network that compares the activation of each neuron to its 'reference activation' and assigns contribution scores according to the difference.
Related Papers (5)
Tianqi Chen,Carlos Guestrin +1 more
- 13 Aug 2016
[...]
Leo Breiman
- 01 Oct 2001