Journal Article10.1111/J.1549-0831.2003.TB00133.X
A Theory of Access.
Jesse C. Ribot,Nancy Lee Peluso +1 more
2.2K
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define access as the ability to derive benefits from things, broadening from property's clas- sical definition as "the right to benefit from things" and examine a broad set of factors that differentiate access from property.
read more
Abstract: The term "access" is frequently used by property and natural resource analysts without adequate definition. In this paper we develop a concept of access and examine a broad set of factors that differentiate access from property. We define access as "the ability to derive benefits from things," broadening from property's clas- sical definition as "the right to benefit from things." Access, following this definition, is more akin to "a bundle of powers" than to property's notion of a "bundle of rights." This formulation includes a wider range of social relationships that constrain or enable benefits from resource use than property relations alone. Using this fram- ing, we suggest a method of access analysis for identifying the constellations of means, relations, and processes that enable various actors to derive benefits from re- sources. Our intent is to enable scholars, planners, and policy makers to empirically "map" dynamic processes and relationships of access.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
An analysis of factors contributing to household water security problems and threats in different settlement categories of Ngamiland, Botswana
TL;DR: In this article, the authors employed quantitative data collection methods (i.e., household structured questionnaires) and qualitative data collection method (e.g., key informant interviews, observation, focus group discussions and informal interviews), complemented by a review of relevant literature.
36
Access to marine ecosystem services: Examining entanglement and legitimacy in customary institutions
Jacqueline Lau,Jacqueline Lau,Joshua E. Cinner,Michael Fabinyi,Georgina G. Gurney,Christina C. Hicks +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a qualitative mixed-methods case study in a coastal atoll community in Papua New Guinea was conducted to identify key access mechanisms across the value chain of marine provisioning services.
36
Tree crop smallholders, capitalism, and adat: Studies in Riau Province1, Indonesia
Lesley Potter,Simon Badcock +1 more
TL;DR: This paper examined the extent to which traditional techniques and practices remain current among a sub-set of Indonesian tree crop smallholders, and found that bio-diverse "jungle rubber" and multi-cropping techniques still exist, but primarily as components of farmers' coping strategies under low commodity prices.
36
The economic importance of charcoal to rural livelihoods: Evidence from a key charcoal-producing area in Ghana
Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey,Lawrence Kwabena Brobbey,Christian Pilegaard Hansen,Boateng Kyereh,Mariève Pouliot +4 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used survey data from 400 charcoal-and non-charcoal-producing households and results from participatory rural appraisals to demonstrate the economic importance of charcoal to rural livelihoods in a key charcoal-producing area in Ghana.
36
Broadening the Land Question in Food Sovereignty to Northern Settings: A Case Study of Occupy the Farm
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors take a case where food sovereignty activists occupied land owned by a public university in California, USA, in order to broaden food sovereignty's land access considerations beyond the South, and analyze conditions where political actions (including occupations) can help achieve changes in land access regimes.
36
References
•Book
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Elinor Ostrom
- 01 Jan 1990
TL;DR: In this paper, an institutional approach to the study of self-organization and self-governance in CPR situations is presented, along with a framework for analysis of selforganizing and selfgoverning CPRs.
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Abstract: In 1985, the National Academy of Sciences sponsored a conference in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss common property resource management. This conference was a watershed in the development of the theoretical underpinning of institutional design for successful common pool resource (CPR) management. Since then, an international network of over 2,000 researchers has developed, and the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), formed in 1989, has held two successful international conferences. Dominating the intellectual evolution of the field has been the work of Elinor Ostrom, co-director of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University. Her book, Governing the Commons, presents a lucid exposition of the current state of institutional analysis of common property problems. Part of the Cam-bridge series on Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, the book addresses how common pool resources may be managed successfully without falling prey to the "tragedy of the commons." Common pool resources are characterized by subtractability (i.e., withdrawal by one user reduces the amount of the resource left for other users) and joint use by a group of appropriators. Thus, a common village grazing field has forage for a limited number of beasts, and all the villagers are entitled to pasture their animals on the field. Community rules of access and management are required to sustain the field from season to season. Problems in managing CPRs arise when the rational individual determines that he will still have access to the resource even if he does not fully contribute to its maintenance (the "free rider" problem). An extensive literature discusses the effect of free riders, concluding that common pool resources will inevitably fall into ruin. One of two solutions is usually offered to avoid this problem: centralized governmental regulation or privatization. Noting the numerous occasions in which common pool resources are managed successfully with neither centralized governmental control nor privatization, Ostrom argues for a third approach to resolving the problem of the commons: the design of durable cooperative institutions that are organized and governed by the resource users. In Governing the Commons she examines small-scale common-pool resources. Resource user groups examined range in size from 50-15,000 people who rely substantially on the common pool resource for their economic well-being. She has further
•Book
The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality
Graham Burchell,Colin Gordon,Peter Miller +2 more
- 01 Apr 1991
TL;DR: Governmental rationality - an introduction, Colin Gordon politics and the study of discourse, Michel Foucault questions of method and governmentality -the genealogy of capital (police and the state of prosperity), Pasquale Pasquino peculiar interests - civil society and governing "the system of natural liberty", Graham Burchell social economy and the government of poverty, Giovanna Procaci the mobilization of society, Jacques Donzelot how should we do the history of statistics, Ian Hacking insurance and risk, Francois Ewald "popular life" and insurance technology, Daniel Defert crim
9.8K
•Book
The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time
Karl Polanyi,Joseph E. Stiglitz,Fred L. Block +2 more
- 28 Mar 2001
TL;DR: In this paper, the key to the institutional system of the 19 century lay in the laws governing market economy, which was the fount and matrix of the system was the self-regulating market, and it was this innovation which gave rise to a specific civilization.
8.9K
The Possibility of Cooperation@@@Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability.@@@Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.@@@Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.
Abstract: In 1985, the National Academy of Sciences sponsored a conference in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss common property resource management. This conference was a watershed in the development of the theoretical underpinning of institutional design for successful common pool resource (CPR) management. Since then, an international network of over 2,000 researchers has developed, and the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), formed in 1989, has held two successful international conferences. Dominating the intellectual evolution of the field has been the work of Elinor Ostrom, co-director of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University. Her book, Governing the Commons, presents a lucid exposition of the current state of institutional analysis of common property problems. Part of the Cam-bridge series on Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, the book addresses how common pool resources may be managed successfully without falling prey to the "tragedy of the commons." Common pool resources are characterized by subtractability (i.e., withdrawal by one user reduces the amount of the resource left for other users) and joint use by a group of appropriators. Thus, a common village grazing field has forage for a limited number of beasts, and all the villagers are entitled to pasture their animals on the field. Community rules of access and management are required to sustain the field from season to season. Problems in managing CPRs arise when the rational individual determines that he will still have access to the resource even if he does not fully contribute to its maintenance (the "free rider" problem). An extensive literature discusses the effect of free riders, concluding that common pool resources will inevitably fall into ruin. One of two solutions is usually offered to avoid this problem: centralized governmental regulation or privatization. Noting the numerous occasions in which common pool resources are managed successfully with neither centralized governmental control nor privatization, Ostrom argues for a third approach to resolving the problem of the commons: the design of durable cooperative institutions that are organized and governed by the resource users. In Governing the Commons she examines small-scale common-pool resources. Resource user groups examined range in size from 50-15,000 people who rely substantially on the common pool resource for their economic well-being. She has further
6.6K