Journal Article10.26794/2308-944x-2024-12-3-6-27
A systematic review on exploring the influence of Industry 4.0 technologies to enhance supply chain visibility and operational efficiency
Tahsina Khan,Md Mehedi Hasan Emon,Md Adnan Rahman +2 more
2
TL;DR: This systematic review explores Industry 4.0's impact on supply chain visibility and efficiency, highlighting the pivotal role of information visibility, regional variations, and the need for adaptive, context-specific strategies to optimize supply chain performance.
read more
Abstract: This systematic review investigates the implications of Industry 4.0 technologies on supply chain visibility and operational efficiency. The primary aim is to discern the impact of technological integration on contemporary supply chain dynamics. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy identified 65 pertinent studies published between 2015 and 2023. The review adheres to systematic methodologies, employing the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme framework for quality assessment. Data synthesis incorporates qualitative and quantitative analyses to distill key themes and patterns. Results: The review unveils the pivotal role of information visibility in fortifying supply chain outcomes, emphasizing the need for a dual investment strategy encompassing technological solutions and a collaborative organizational culture. Regional variations in supply chain practices, insights from humanitarian supply chains, and the influence of environmental factors on agility broaden the understanding of Industry 4.0 implications. Organizations are urged to adopt a context-specific, adaptive approach, recognizing the significance of intangible assets and tailoring strategies to local contexts for optimal supply chain performance. This systematic review contributes a nuanced understanding of Industry 4.0’s transformative potential in supply chain management, emphasizing the interplay between technology, organizational culture, and regional contexts.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Circularity Meets AI
Md Mehedi Hasan Emon
Abstract: This chapter explores the integration of circular economy principles with artificial intelligence (AI) to transform waste into valuable business assets. It outlines the frameworks and business relevance of circularity, emphasizing how waste can be redefined as a resource for innovation. The chapter highlights AI's role in enabling circular strategies, from waste detection and sorting to predictive analytics and lifecycle tracking. Through case studies from companies like Adidas, Unilever, and IKEA, it illustrates how AI-driven circular models create brand value. Ethical considerations and challenges, including data privacy and environmental impacts, are also discussed. Finally, the chapter examines future directions, emphasizing the potential of emerging technologies to further align AI with circular economy goals and revolutionize green marketing strategies.
Purpose-Driven Intelligence in Green Marketing
Md Mehedi Hasan Emon
Abstract: This chapter explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping corporate social responsibility (CSR) and purpose-driven marketing to build sustainable brand equity. As consumers increasingly demand ethical and environmentally responsible practices, AI offers powerful tools to decode consumer sentiment, personalize CSR messaging, and amplify sustainability narratives with precision and authenticity. Through real-world examples and a strategic framework, the chapter illustrates how AI supports transparent communication, stakeholder engagement, and ethical decision-making in CSR initiatives. It also addresses the ethical challenges of AI use, emphasizing responsible practices to avoid bias and greenwashing. Finally, this chapter highlights AI's role as a catalyst for integrating purpose and performance, enabling brands to align business success with social and environmental commitments in an evolving sustainable ecosystem.
References
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
David Moher,Larissa Shamseer,Mike Clarke,Davina Ghersi,Alessandro Liberati,Mark Petticrew,Paul G. Shekelle,Lesley A. Stewart +7 more
TL;DR: A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
22.9K
Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends
TL;DR: The state of the art in the area of Industry 4.0 as it relates to industries is surveyed, with a focus on China's Made-in-China 2025 and formal methods and systems methods crucial for realising Industry 5.0.
2.6K
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering : An update
TL;DR: There was a need to provide an update of how to conduct systematic mapping studies and how the guidelines should be updated based on the lessons learned from the existing systematic maps and SLR guidelines.
2.4K
The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance
Lucas Santos Dalenogare,Guilherme Brittes Benitez,Néstor Fabián Ayala,Alejandro Germán Frank +3 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied how the adoption of different Industry 4.0 technologies is associated with expected benefits for product, operations and side-effects aspects in the Brazilian industry.
1.7K
How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses.
TL;DR: It is argued that systematic reviews are a key methodology for clarifying whether and how research findings replicate and for explaining possible inconsistencies, and it is called for researchers to conduct systematic reviews to help elucidate whether there is a replication crisis.
1.7K