Journal Article10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122452
A stable-state multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition
Jing Ping Wang,Yuxin Zheng,Pengcheng Huang,Hu Peng,Zhijian Wu +4 more
6
About: This article is published in Expert Systems With Applications.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
An Improved MOEA/D with an Auction-Based Matching Mechanism
TL;DR: This study proposes MOEA/D-ABM, an improved multi-objective evolutionary algorithm that balances convergence and diversity using an auction-based matching mechanism and adaptive weight vector adjustment, outperforming six state-of-the-art MOEAs on benchmark problems with 2-10 objectives.
1
A Decomposition-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Solving Low-Carbon Scheduling of Ship Segment Painting
TL;DR: A decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for solving low-carbon scheduling of ship segment painting effectively reduces carbon emissions and improves painting efficiency.
1
A clustering-based archive handling method and multi-objective optimization of the optimal power flow problem
Mustafa Akbel,Hamdi Tolga Kahraman,Serhat Duman,Seyithan Temel +3 more
An Agile Approach for Adopting Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Energy Solutions with Advanced Computational Techniques
David Abdul Konneh,Harun Or Rashid Howlader,M.H. Elkholy,Tomonobu Senjyu +3 more
- 28 Apr 2024
TL;DR: An agile approach for adopting sustainable and environmentally friendly energy solutions with advanced computational techniques introduces a dynamic framework for integrating and optimizing renewable energy solutions. The study presents an agile multi-criteria decision tool and compares variants of advanced algorithmic approaches to select optimal configurations.
An Agile Approach for Adopting Sustainable Energy Solutions with Advanced Computational Techniques
David Abdul Konneh,Harun Or Rashid Howlader,M.H. Elkholy,Tomonobu Senjyu +3 more
TL;DR: An agile approach for adopting sustainable energy solutions with advanced computational techniques introduces a dynamic framework for policymakers and experts to optimize configurations of renewable energy solutions. The study presents an agile multi-criteria decision tool and compares variants of advanced algorithmic approaches to select optimal configurations.
References
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
TL;DR: This paper suggests a non-dominated sorting-based MOEA, called NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II), which alleviates all of the above three difficulties, and modify the definition of dominance in order to solve constrained multi-objective problems efficiently.
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
Qingfu Zhang,Hui Li +1 more
TL;DR: Experimental results have demonstrated that MOEA/D with simple decomposition methods outperforms or performs similarly to MOGLS and NSGA-II on multiobjective 0-1 knapsack problems and continuous multiobjectives optimization problems.
SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm
Eckart Zitzler,Marco Laumanns,Lothar Thiele +2 more
- 01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: An improved version of SPEA, namely SPEA2, is proposed, which incorporates in contrast to its predecessor a fine-grained fitness assignment strategy, a density estimation technique, and an enhanced archive truncation method.
6K
An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems With Box Constraints
Kalyanmoy Deb,Himanshu Jain +1 more
TL;DR: A reference-point-based many-objective evolutionary algorithm that emphasizes population members that are nondominated, yet close to a set of supplied reference points is suggested that is found to produce satisfactory results on all problems considered in this paper.
Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results
TL;DR: This paper provides a systematic comparison of various evolutionary approaches to multiobjective optimization using six carefully chosen test functions and shows that elitism is shown to be an important factor for improving evolutionary multiobjectives search.