Journal Article10.1088/1742-2132/6/3/003
A practical implicit finite-difference method: examples from seismic modelling
Yang Liu,Yang Liu,Mrinal K. Sen +2 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors derived explicit and new implicit finite-difference formulae for derivatives of arbitrary order with any order of accuracy by the plane wave theory where the finite difference coefficients are obtained from the Taylor series expansion.
read more
Abstract: We derive explicit and new implicit finite-difference formulae for derivatives of arbitrary order with any order of accuracy by the plane wave theory where the finite-difference coefficients are obtained from the Taylor series expansion. The implicit finite-difference formulae are derived from fractional expansion of derivatives which form tridiagonal matrix equations. Our results demonstrate that the accuracy of a (2N + 2)th-order implicit formula is nearly equivalent to that of a (6N + 2)th-order explicit formula for the first-order derivative, and (2N + 2)th-order implicit formula is nearly equivalent to (4N + 2)th-order explicit formula for the second-order derivative. In general, an implicit method is computationally more expensive than an explicit method, due to the requirement of solving large matrix equations. However, the new implicit method only involves solving tridiagonal matrix equations, which is fairly inexpensive. Furthermore, taking advantage of the fact that many repeated calculations of derivatives are performed by the same difference formula, several parts can be precomputed resulting in a fast algorithm. We further demonstrate that a (2N + 2)th-order implicit formulation requires nearly the same memory and computation as a (2N + 4)th-order explicit formulation but attains the accuracy achieved by a (6N + 2)th-order explicit formulation for the first-order derivative and that of a (4N + 2)th-order explicit method for the second-order derivative when additional cost of visiting arrays is not considered. This means that a high-order explicit method may be replaced by an implicit method of the same order resulting in a much improved performance. Our analysis of efficiency and numerical modelling results for acoustic and elastic wave propagation validates the effectiveness and practicality of the implicit finite-difference method.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A new time-space domain high-order finite-difference method for the acoustic wave equation
Yang Liu,Mrinal K. Sen +1 more
TL;DR: A new unified methodology to derive spatial finite-difference coefficients in the joint time-space domain to reduce numerical dispersion and can be easily extended to solve similar partial difference equations arising in other fields of science and engineering.
203
Three-dimensional elastic wave numerical modelling in the presence of surface topography by a collocated-grid finite-difference method on curvilinear grids
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used generalized curvilinear grids that can fit the surface topography to discretize the computational domain and described the implementation of a collocated grid finite-difference scheme, a higher order MacCormack scheme, to solve the first-order hyperbolic velocity-stress equations on the curvilanear grid.
Globally optimal finite-difference schemes based on least squares
TL;DR: In this article, second-order spatial derivatives were examined and the optimized spatial finite-difference coefficients over the given wavenumber range using the least-squares (LS) method were given.
163
Optimized explicit finite-difference schemes for spatial derivatives using maximum norm
Jinhai Zhang,Zhenxing Yao +1 more
TL;DR: The explicit finite-difference operator is greatly improved by the optimized scheme, which allows for tighter error limitation, which is shown to be necessary to avoid rapid error accumulations for simulations on large-scale models with long travel times.
121
Determination of finite-difference weights using scaled binomial windows
Chunlei Chu,Paul L. Stoffa +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a truncated convolutional version of the pseudospectral method is used to derive finite-difference operators with different dispersion properties, and these scaled binomial windows can also be used to obtain optimized finite difference operators with enhanced dispersion.
108
References
•Book
Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN
William H. Press,Saul A. Teukolsky,Brian P. Flannery,William T. Vetterling +3 more
- 01 Feb 1990
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a reference record for the Diskette v 2.04, 3.5'' (720k) for IBM PC, PS/2 and compatibles, created on 2004-09-07, modified on 2016-08-08
6.6K
Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present finite-difference schemes for the evaluation of first-order, second-order and higher-order derivatives yield improved representation of a range of scales and may be used on nonuniform meshes.
6.3K
P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method
TL;DR: In this paper, a finite-difference method for modeling P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media is presented, which is an extension of the method I previously proposed for modeling SH-wave propagation by using velocity and stress in a discrete grid, where the stability condition and the P-wave phase velocity dispersion curve do not depend on the Poisson's ratio.
•Book
Imaging the Earth's Interior
Jon F. Claerbout
- 01 Jan 1985
TL;DR: The craft of wavefield extrapolation Some frontiers as discussed by the authors have been frontiers in the field of wave field imaging, and they have been explored in time and space, as well.
1.6K