1. What are the future works in this paper?
Contrary to research in students ’ choices aiming at identifying and mapping the variables that affect students ’ choices, theories about narratives provide a framework to study the complexity when students make choices.. The findings emphasise a need for caution concerning methodologies in future studies.. Firstly, care needs to be taken when interpreting student responses that they always wanted to study a particular subject.. The framework allows for new interpretation of how the students ’ descriptions of always wanting to study a certain study programme change over time, including after students begin higher education.
read more
2. What are the contributions in this paper?
The chapter argues that a narrative approach provides an understanding of choice of study as continuous processes where individuals work on their identities in terms of negotiating and constructing a coherent choice-narrative.. As a consequence future studies need to be careful when interpreting student statements about how they always wanted to study a particular subject.. At the end of the chapter consequences for future research are discussed as well as how this approach to students ’ choices of study contributes to their understanding of students ’ science, technology, engineering and mathematics ( STEM ) choices.
read more
3. What is the purpose of disruptive elements removed from the narrative?
Disruptive elements are removed from the narrative to maintain a degree of meaning and stability (Crossley, 2000), and new elements are added in a process of negotiation and identity work.
read more
4. What does Filip’s idea of having to make his choice by himself suggest?
Filip’s idea of having to make his choice by himself also suggests his notion of how a proper choice should be made, namely without the influence of anyone else.
read more