Journal Article10.1108/MD-07-2018-0795
A multi-dimensional meta-heuristic model for managing organizational change
12
TL;DR: This model is a road map informing higher echelons of the complexity and leadership of change, while at the same time helping change agents have access to acceptable amount of variables that can make their change attempts more promising.
read more
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to offer a dynamic meta-heuristic model of effecting organizational change which informs smooth directing and routinizing change according to the specific situation relevant to every change attempt.,Because of the dynamic nature of variables and their interaction, developing a static model cannot be tenable. This study, therefore, attempts to generate a meta-heuristic method for constructing a dynamic organizational change model by combining qualitative methods (content analysis and Delphi Technique) and Artificial Neural Networks (Fuzzy Theory and Genetic Algorithm).,Each change program requires its unique method of implementation as change attempts are context specific. Hence, static models should give way to some dynamic ones. Whereas such static models abound, this paper stands out as offering a dynamic model for organizational change by using a rather unconventional method.,This can be regarded as a road map informing higher echelons of the complexity and leadership of change, while at the same time helping change agents have access to acceptable amount of variables that can make their change attempts more promising.,This model contains more flexible variables which reflect the incumbent organizations’ situations. While almost all previous models of change attempt take into account a few/handful variables which are seen to impact on change solidly and independently. But such an analysis with the usual statistical and mathematical methods is not justified. This challenge is met here using metaheuristics and artificial intelligence methods. The model formulated, thus, is dynamic, non-linear and multi-dimensional. Entering the data related to any specific field turns it to a customized model suitable for use in a given field; and this is not only a contribution to the theory but also can allegedly increase the chance of the success of the change agent managing to utilize the optimal amount of variables suggested in this paper.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
An Overview of Reviews: Organizational Change Management Architecture
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors provide an overview of the state-of-the-art organizational change taxonomy, focusing on nine thematic groups containing a total of 41 change variables, including strategic and behavioral change variables.
14
Neuro-Genetic Hybrid System for Management of Organizational Development Measures.
Olena Skrynnyk,Tetyana Vasilyeva +1 more
- 01 Jan 2020
TL;DR: This paper presents an approach based on an artificial neural network with elements of a fuzzy approach and a genetic algorithm to control organizational development to ensure the long-term effectiveness of organizational development measures.
Symbolic Convergence or Divergence? Making Sense of (the Rhetorical) Senses of a University-Wide Organizational Change.
Lina Ba,W. G. Will Zhao +1 more
TL;DR: This article investigated the extent to which organizational change initiatives may lead to divergent patterns of sensemaking among organizational members and found that the lack of cognitive convergence between change initiators and change recipients suggests the inherent incompatibility between managerial and employee fantasies around organizational change, barring the exceptions of dual-responsibility change recipients who tend to adopt the change initiator rhetoric.
AI Transformation in the Public Sector: Ongoing Research
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of bottom-up approaches, such as pilot projects and mentoring to specific groups within organizations, and explore how such approaches can complement the top-down approach of strategic AI implementation.
3
Design and development a model to present practices for implementation cloud manufacturing system
Sania Heidari,Sajjad Shoukohyar,Davoud Mohammaditabar,Vahidreza Ghezavati +3 more
- 29 May 2021
TL;DR: The outcomes of the study highlighted that three factors, including customer scoring, R&D, and method development were the most important factors impressing the implementation cloud manufacturing systems.
1
References
Explaining Development and Change in Organizations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce four basic theories that may serve as building blocks for explaining processes of change in organizations: life cycle, teleology, dialectics, and evolution, which represent different sequences of change events that are driven by different conceptual motors and operate at different organizational levels.
Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism
Royston Greenwood,C. R. Hinings +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors set out a framework for understanding organizational changes from the perspective of neo-institutional theory and examined the processes by which individual organizations retain, adopt, and discard templates for organizing, given the institutionalized nature of organizational fields.
3.2K
Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review various literature streams to develop a comprehensive model that covers research into the antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of organizational ambidexterity, defined as an organization's ability to be aligned and efficient in its management of today's business demands while simultaneously being adaptive to changes in the environment.
2.6K
Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths
TL;DR: Positive organizational behavior (POB) as discussed by the authors follows the lead of recently emerging positive psychology, which is driven by theory and research focusing on people's strengths and psychological capabilities instead of just retreading and putting a positive spin on traditional organizational behavior concepts.
1.8K
Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present several studies that examine organizational change including an examination of the multiple contexts and levels of analysis in studying organizational change, the inclusion of time, history, process and action, the link between change processes and organizational performance, the investigation of international and cross-cultural comparisons, the study of receptivity, customization, sequencing, pace and episodic versus continuous change and the partnership between scholars and practitioners in studying change.
1.6K