1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "A magnetic phase diagram for nanoscale epitaxial bifeo3 films" ?
This report aims to end “ trial and error ” approaches in determining the conditions under which this cycloid and its associated functional magnonic response exist.. The authors show that in specific crystallographic orientations of epitaxial BiFeO3, an unexplored strain parameter—the distortion in the ab plane of the monoclinic unit cell—significantly influences the spin structure.. Combining M€ossbauer spectroscopy and low-energy Raman spectroscopy with first-principles-based effective Hamiltonian calculations, the authors show that both average strain and this distortion destroy the cycloid.. The authors are thereby able to construct a phase diagram of the spin structure for nanoscale epitaxial BiFeO3 films, which aims to resolve long-standing literature inconsistencies and provide powerful guidelines for the design of future magnonic and spintronic devices.. Multiferroics are widely studied since they offer great promise in memory and spintronic devices.
read more
2. What is the funding for this research?
This research was partially supported by the Australian Research Council Center of Excellence in Future Low-Energy Electronics Technologies (Project No. CE170100039), and the Australian Research Council (ARC) through the funding of Discovery Grants and funded by the Australian Government.
read more
3. Who is the author of this paper?
B.X. thanks the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, for financial support under Contract No. ER46612, the startup fund from Soochow University, and the support from Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
read more
4. What is the funding for this work?
This work is supported by a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program (Labex NanoSaclay, reference: ANR-10-LABX-0035).
read more
![FIG. 3. First-principles-based calculations. (a) Total energy of the type-2 cycloid relative to the collinear AFM phase with L//[001]pc, in (110) BFO films (with e¼þ0.7%) as a function of unit cell distortion d. For d < 1.2%, the type-2 cycloid with K4//[112] propagation direction is found to be the ground state, while if d 1.2%, a collinear AFM order with spins aligned along [001] is stable. Depictions of (b) the type-2 cycloid (rotations are 8 exaggerated) and (c) collinear AFM order with L//[001], respectively, for six monoclinic BFO unit cells.](/figures/fig-3-first-principles-based-calculations-a-total-energy-of-1nuwhbbp.png)
![FIG. 1. Sample structural details: (a) schematic of the monoclinic MB unit cell as found in (110)-oriented films (adapted from Ref. 40). In such a monoclinic structure, the aBFO lattice parameter is in fact out of plane [i.e., close to parallel with the (110) STO direction]. (b) (i) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) topography image of the 126 nm film showing root mean square (rms) roughness of 0.4 nm. (b) (ii) PFM outof-plane phase image, showing a single FE domain for the 126 nm film. (c) Lattice parameters and monoclinic angle as a function of thickness; a monotonic increase (decrease) in the in-plane bBFO and cBFO (out-of-plane aBFO) parameters is observed, consistent with gradual strain relaxation. The values of strain (e) and distortion (d) for the present set of films shown here.](/figures/fig-1-sample-structural-details-a-schematic-of-the-pgud3brm.png)