Open Access
A kind of discordant harmony: issues in assimilation.
Bikales G,Imhoff G +1 more
- 01 Jan 1988
6
TL;DR: The salad bowl metaphor for this approach conveys a mixture in which the elements combine without losing their individual character as discussed by the authors. But anti-discrimination remedies cannot help those who are in the throes of assimilation.
read more
Abstract: In the US the majority is intimately involved in assimilating minorities. The degree of cultural assimilation which American society has expected of immigrants has changed significantly over time. The 1st attitude (which began in the late 1800s) was that America was a "melting pot" where people of many nationalities and languages could come together and live in discordant harmony while they assimilated to the national norm. The migrant received liberty and economic rewards. The US received cheap labor and psychological gratification from being regarded as the land of opportunity. In 1915 Horace Kallen challenged the idea of complete cultural metamorphosis and proposed the concept of "cultural pluralism." Cultural pluralism would encourage the maintenance of the individuals ethnic group ties and culture of origin; the US would be an amalgam of its many separate cultural parts. In the 1960s the black pride movement provided a model and basis upon which other ethnic groups could build. There has been a shift in the relative importance of being American as opposed to belonging to a distinct racial cultural or ethnic subgroup. The salad bowl metaphor for this approach conveys a mixture in which the elements combine without losing their individual character. A combination of powerful forces impede assimilation such as 1) immigration is at the highest level in US history 2) a majority of migrants speak 1 language--Spanish and 3) many new migrants will maintain ties with their home countries. Studies show that 1) many Mexican migrants dont identify themselves as American and 2) while the Spanish language is becoming the most important mechanism for preserving Hispanic cultural identity most other traditions associated with Hispanic culture are weakening. However the trend toward Americanization is occurring. At present the US is trying to lessen the need for migrants to assimilate. But anti-discrimination remedies cannot help those who are in the throes of assimilation. The truly open and accepting society will work hard to facilitate the assimilation and integration of immigrants into itself; it will not create special exemptions special ghettos to isolate immigrants and preserve their differences. The clearly stated goal of US society must be the integration of ethnic minorities within the mainstream culture.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
•Dissertation
The "English-only" Debate: The English Language Amendment and American Politics
Susan Sumner
- 07 Apr 1995
4
Transitional Bilingual Education and the Socialization of Immigrants
TL;DR: The authors argue that U.S. educational policies reflect an implicit economic need to socialize immigrants and minority group members to fill necessary, but undesirable, low-status jobs, and that the subsequent discrepancy between the learning capacities of immigrant children and their monolingual peers reinforces stereotypes of immigrants and some linguistic minorities, and serves to socially legitimize their economically required limited access to better jobs.
Language and Politics in the 1980s: The Story of U.S. English
TL;DR: The conservative movement, or New Right, has been highly successful in moving its agenda of social traditionalism, economic libertarianism, and fierce anticommunism to the center of public debate, usurping discursive terrain previously dominated by liberals as discussed by the authors.
Aspira v. Board of Education Revisited
TL;DR: In this paper, a 10-year overview of the implementation of the consent decree is presented, concluding that the board has failed to provide the program to large numbers of children, to systematically monitor the implementation and evaluation of the program, and to evaluate the educational outcomes.