Journal Article10.2307/2091811
A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations
2.6K
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a conceptualization of complex organizations in terms of their technologies, or the work done on raw materials, and the variations in three types of goals are weakly related to the preceding variables.
read more
Abstract: Complex organizations are conceptualized in terms of their technologies, or the work done on raw materials. Two aspects of technology vary independently: the number of exceptions that must be handled, and the degree to which search is an analyzable or unanalyzable procedure. If there is a large number of exceptions and search is not logical and analytic, the technology is described as nonroutine. Few exceptions and analyzable search procedures describe a routine technology. Two other types result from other combinations-craft and engineering technologies. Task structures vary with the technology utilized, and are analyzed in terms of control and coordination and three levels of management. Social structure in turn is related to technology and task structure. Finally, the variations in three types of goals are weakly related to the preceding variables in this conceptualization. The perspective provides a basis for comparing organizations which avoids many problems found in other schemes utilizing structure, function or goals as the basis for comparison. Furthermore, it allows one to selectively utilize competing organizational theories once it is understood that their relevance is restricted to organizations with specific kinds of technologies. The scheme makes apparent some errors in present efforts to compare organizations.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
On Organizational Size and Administrative Ratios: A Critical Examination of General and Specialized Hospitals
J. Champion,Haidee Betterton +1 more
- 01 Jan 1974
TL;DR: The administration ratio (A/P) of an organization is defined as the proportion of individuals performing administrative functions in relation to the total number of production personnel in the organization, and it is reciprocally affected by certain variables as discussed by the authors.
8
Uncertainty, equivocality and integrative practices in a product development context
Youngsoo Park
- 01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: This chapter discusses uncertainty and Equivocality in a Product Development Context, and the link between the Task Environment and Integrative Practices and Product Development Outcomes, as well as research methods and theory and hypothesis development.
8
Diagnosing Organization-Environment “Fit”: Implications for Organization Development
TL;DR: A major purpose of organizational development (OD) is to help organizations, groups, and individuals become more effective in terms of performance, growth, and satisfaction as mentioned in this paper, which is the focus of most of the OD field.
8
•Book
Achieving integration through information systems
Jay R. Galbraith
- 16 Aug 2011
TL;DR: The article illustrates various examples of system design challenges, emphasizing the importance of three factors: task uncertainty, departmentalization, and the ease of using buffers.
8
References
Intraorganizational Structural Variation: Application of the Bureaucratic Model
TL;DR: Hall et al. as discussed by the authors found that organizational segments, both vertical and horizontal, varied significantly in their degree of bureaucratization, and that the type of task performed by the organizational segment was an important determinant of the variation.