A Dynamic Analysis of University Agricultural Biotechnology Patent Production
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the factors that account for agricultural biotechnology patenting success among universities using a dynamic count data model, and built a theoretical and econometric model to capture the inherently dynamic and nonlinear process of technological innovation.
read more
Abstract: This article examines the factors that account for agricultural biotechnology patenting success among universities using a dynamic count data model. It builds a theoretical and econometric model to capture the inherently dynamic and nonlinear process of technological innovation, wherein a feedback mechanism from previous success partially determines current patent counts. The econometric estimates reveal the importance to agricultural biotechnology patent production of land grant infrastructure, quality faculty, patent-oriented technology transfer offices, as well as dynamic feedback effects. The advent of exclusive property rights for university research (specifically the Bayh-Dole act) has created the potential for major changes in the missions of U.S. universities, especially among land grant universities (LGUs), as well as in the overall system of technology creation and distribution in agriculture. At the same time, new genetic and cloning technologies, along with the recently created ability to patent plants and living organisms, are profoundly changing the range of agricultural technologies that are likely to be available in the United States and internationally. Indeed, as Zilberman, Yarkin, and Heiman argue, these new agricultural biotechnologies (ag-biotech), and their associated intellectual property rights, appear to be creating a new paradigm, a veritable revolution, in the organization and interaction of university research and the agricultural sector. Under this new paradigm, universities emphasize patenting innovations, and then granting (at times
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors derive eight hypotheses that link attributes of resources and capabilities, institutional, financial, commercial and human capital, to university spinoff outcomes using panel data from 1980 to 2001.
1K
Regression Analysis of Count Data: Preface
A. Colin Cameron,Pravin K. Trivedi +1 more
- 01 Jan 1998
894
The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities? ☆
TL;DR: This paper examined the individual, contextual, and institutional determinants of faculty patenting behavior in a panel dataset of 3862 academic life scientists and found that patenting events are preceded by a flurry of publications, even holding constant time-invariant scientific talent and the latent patentability of a scientist's research.
A literature review of intellectual property management in technology transfer offices: From appropriation to utilization
Marcus Holgersson,Lise Aaboen +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a systematic literature review of the intersection between intellectual property management and technology transfer offices (TTOs) in the context of universities in order to understand how TTOs manage IP.
79
Spatial differences in the quality of university patenting: Do regions matter?
TL;DR: In this paper, a multilevel framework was proposed to identify the effects of factors at three hierarchical levels (individual, university, and regional) on the quality of university patenting.
43
References
•Book
Regression Analysis of Count Data
A. Colin Cameron,Pravin K. Trivedi +1 more
- 28 Sep 1998
TL;DR: The authors combine theory and practice to make sophisticated methods of analysis accessible to researchers and practitioners working with widely different types of data and software in areas such as applied statistics, econometrics, marketing, operations research, actuarial studies, demography, biostatistics and quantitative social sciences.
6.2K
Regression Analysis of Count Data
TL;DR: The authors combine theory and practice to make sophisticated methods of analysis accessible to researchers and practitioners working with widely different types of data and software in areas such as applied statistics, econometrics, marketing, operations research, actuarial studies, demography, biostatistics and quantitative social sciences.
Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship
TL;DR: This paper developed and adapted statistical models of counts (nonnegative integers) in the context of panel data and used them to analyze the relationship between patents and R&D expenditures. But their model is not suitable for the analysis of large-scale data sets.
A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors put forward patent counts weighted by citations as indicators of the value of innovations, thereby overcoming the limitations of simple counts, and found that simple patent counts are highly correlated with contemporaneous RD, however, the association is within afield over time rather than cross-sectional.
3.2K
•Posted Content
Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed and adapted statistical models of counts (nonnegative integers) in the context of panel data and used them to analyze the relationship between patents and RD persistent individual (fixed or random) effects, and "noise" or randomness in the Poisson probability function.
2.8K