A computational model for understanding stem cell, trophectoderm and endoderm lineage determination
TL;DR: A dynamical model of a minimalistic network based upon differential equations provides a mechanistic understanding of how different lineages arise from the dynamics of the underlying regulatory network and provides a framework to explore strategies of reprogramming a cell from a differentiated state to a stem cell state through directed perturbations.
read more
Abstract: Background: Recent studies have associated the transcription factors, Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog as parts of a self-regulating network which is responsible for maintaining embryonic stem cell properties: self renewal and pluripotency. In addition, mutual antagonism between two of these and other master regulators have been shown to regulate lineage determination. In particular, an excess of Cdx2 over Oct4 determines the trophectoderm lineage whereas an excess of Gata-6 over Nanog determines differentiation into the endoderm lineage. Also, under/over-expression studies of the master regulator Oct4 have revealed that some self-renewal/pluripotency as well as differentiation genes are expressed in a biphasic manner with respect to the concentration of Oct4.
Methodology/Principal Findings: We construct a dynamical model of a minimalistic network, extracted from ChIP-on-chip and microarray data as well as literature studies. The model is based upon differential equations and makes two plausible assumptions; activation of Gata-6 by Oct4 and repression of Nanog by an Oct4–Gata-6 heterodimer. With these assumptions, the results of simulations successfully describe the biphasic behavior as well as lineage commitment. The model also predicts that reprogramming the network from a differentiated state, in particular the endoderm state, into a stem cell state, is best achieved by over-expressing Nanog, rather than by suppression of differentiation genes such as Gata-6.
Conclusions: The computational model provides a mechanistic understanding of how different lineages arise from the dynamics of the underlying regulatory network. It provides a framework to explore strategies of reprogramming a cell from a differentiated state to a stem cell state through directed perturbations. Such an approach is highly relevant to regenerative medicine since it allows for a rapid search over the host of possibilities for reprogramming to a stem cell state.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Forcing cells to change lineages
Thomas Graf,Tariq Enver +1 more
TL;DR: The ability to produce stem cells by induced pluripotency (iPS reprogramming) has rekindled an interest in earlier studies showing that transcription factors can directly convert specialized cells from one lineage to another.
Cell Fate Decision as High-Dimensional Critical State Transition.
Mitra Mojtahedi,Alexander Skupin,Joseph X. Zhou,Ivan G. Castano,Rebecca Y. Y. Leong-Quong,Hannah H. Chang,Kalliopi Trachana,Alessandro Giuliani,Sui Huang,Sui Huang +9 more
TL;DR: Early warning signals associated with critical transitions can be detected in statistical ensembles of high-dimensional systems, offering a formal theory-based approach for analyzing single-cell molecular profiles that goes beyond current computational pattern recognition, does not require knowledge of specific pathways, and could be used to predict impending major shifts in development and disease.
Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction.
TL;DR: The nature of the stem cell substates and their relationship to commitment to differentiate and lineage selection can be elucidated in terms of a landscape picture in which stable states can be defined mathematically as attractors.
357
Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness.
Sui Huang,Sui Huang +1 more
TL;DR: A pedagogical primer to the fundamental principles of gene regulatory networks as integrated dynamic systems as well as recent insights in gene expression noise and fate determination are provided, thereby offering a formal framework that may help to understand why cell fate reprogramming events are inherently rare and yet so robust.
333
Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells
Rong Lu,Rong Lu,Florian Markowetz,Florian Markowetz,Richard D. Unwin,Jeffrey T. Leek,Edoardo M. Airoldi,Edoardo M. Airoldi,Ben D. MacArthur,Alexander Lachmann,Roye Rozov,Roye Rozov,Avi Ma'ayan,Laurie A. Boyer,Olga G. Troyanskaya,Anthony D. Whetton,Ihor R. Lemischka,Ihor R. Lemischka +17 more
Abstract: Molecular regulation of embryonic stem cell (ESC) fate involves a coordinated interaction between epigenetic, transcriptional and translational mechanisms. It is unclear how these different molecular regulatory mechanisms interact to regulate changes in stem cell fate. Here we present a dynamic systems-level study of cell fate change in murine ESCs following a well-defined perturbation. Global changes in histone acetylation, chromatin-bound RNA polymerase II, messenger RNA (mRNA), and nuclear protein levels were measured over 5 days after downregulation of Nanog, a key pluripotency regulator. Our data demonstrate how a single genetic perturbation leads to progressive widespread changes in several molecular regulatory layers, and provide a dynamic view of information flow in the epigenome, transcriptome and proteome. We observe that a large proportion of changes in nuclear protein levels are not accompanied by concordant changes in the expression of corresponding mRNAs, indicating important roles for translational and post-translational regulation of ESC fate. Gene-ontology analysis across different molecular layers indicates that although chromatin reconfiguration is important for altering cell fate, it is preceded by transcription-factor-mediated regulatory events. The temporal order of gene expression alterations shows the order of the regulatory network reconfiguration and offers further insight into the gene regulatory network. Our studies extend the conventional systems biology approach to include many molecular species, regulatory layers and temporal series, and underscore the complexity of the multilayer regulatory mechanisms responsible for changes in protein expression that determine stem cell fate.
References
Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors.
TL;DR: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic or adult fibroblasts by introducing four factors, Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4, under ES cell culture conditions is demonstrated and iPS cells, designated iPS, exhibit the morphology and growth properties of ES cells and express ES cell marker genes.
27K
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors
Kazutoshi Takahashi,Koji Tanabe,Mari Ohnuki,Megumi Narita,Tomoko Ichisaka,Kiichiro Tomoda,Shinya Yamanaka +6 more
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that iPS cells can be generated from adult human fibroblasts with the same four factors: Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc.
19.9K
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells From Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors
Kazutoshi Takahashi,Koji Tanabe,Mari Ohnuki,Megumi Narita,Tomoko Ichisaka,Kiichiro Tomoda,Shinya Yamanaka +6 more
TL;DR: This work generated induced pluripotent stem cells capable of germline transmission from murine somatic cells by transd, and demonstrated the ability of these cells to reprogram into patient-specific and disease-specific stem cells.
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells
Junying Yu,Maxim A. Vodyanik,Kim Smuga-Otto,Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget,Jennifer L. Frane,Shulan Tian,Jeff Nie,Gudrun A. Jonsdottir,Victor Ruotti,Ron Stewart,Igor I. Slukvin,James A. Thomson +11 more
TL;DR: This article showed that OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, and LIN28 factors are sufficient to reprogram human somatic cells to pluripotent stem cells that exhibit the essential characteristics of embryonic stem (ES) cells.
10.9K
Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells.
Laurie A. Boyer,Tong Ihn Lee,Megan F. Cole,Sarah E. Johnstone,Stuart S. Levine,Jacob P. Zucker,Matthew G. Guenther,Roshan M. Kumar,Heather L. Murray,Richard G. Jenner,David K. Gifford,David K. Gifford,David K. Gifford,Douglas A. Melton,Douglas A. Melton,Rudolf Jaenisch,Richard A. Young,Richard A. Young +17 more
TL;DR: Insight is provided into the transcriptional regulation of stem cells and how OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG contribute to pluripotency and self-renewal and how they collaborate to form regulatory circuitry consisting of autoregulatory and feedforward loops.
4.7K
Related Papers (5)
Laurie A. Boyer,Tong Ihn Lee,Megan F. Cole,Sarah E. Johnstone,Stuart S. Levine,Jacob P. Zucker,Matthew G. Guenther,Roshan M. Kumar,Heather L. Murray,Richard G. Jenner,David K. Gifford,David K. Gifford,David K. Gifford,Douglas A. Melton,Douglas A. Melton,Rudolf Jaenisch,Richard A. Young,Richard A. Young +17 more
Yuin-Han Loh,Qiang Wu,Joon Lin Chew,Joon Lin Chew,Vinsensius B. Vega,Weiwei Zhang,Weiwei Zhang,Xi Chen,Xi Chen,Guillaume Bourque,Joshy George,Bernard Leong,Jun Liu,Kee Yew Wong,Ken W. Sung,Charlie W.H. Lee,Xiao Dong Zhao,Kuo Ping Chiu,Leonard Lipovich,Vladimir A. Kuznetsov,Paul Robson,Paul Robson,Lawrence W. Stanton,Chia-Lin Wei,Yijun Ruan,Bing Lim,Bing Lim,Huck-Hui Ng,Huck-Hui Ng +28 more