A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health.
Byron J. Powell,J. Curtis McMillen,Enola K. Proctor,Chris Carpenter,Richard T. Griffey,Alicia C. Bunger,Joseph E. Glass,Jennifer L. York +7 more
TL;DR: This consolidated compilation can serve as a reference to stakeholders who wish to implement clinical innovations in health and mental health care and can facilitate the development of multifaceted, multilevel implementation plans that are tailored to local contexts.
read more
Abstract: Efforts to identify, develop, refine, and test strategies to disseminate and implement evidence-based treatments have been prioritized in order to improve the quality of health and mental health care delivery. However, this task is complicated by an implementation science literature characterized by inconsistent language use and inadequate descriptions of implementation strategies. This article brings more depth and clarity to implementation research and practice by presenting a consolidated compilation of discrete implementation strategies, based on a review of 205 sources published between 1995 and 2011. The resulting compilation includes 68 implementation strategies and definitions, which are grouped according to six key implementation processes: planning, educating, financing, restructuring, managing quality, and attending to the policy context. This consolidated compilation can serve as a reference to stakeholders who wish to implement clinical innovations in health and mental health care and can fac...
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.
Byron J. Powell,Thomas J. Waltz,Matthew Chinman,Laura J. Damschroder,Jeffrey L. Smith,Monica M. Matthieu,Monica M. Matthieu,Enola K. Proctor,JoAnn E. Kirchner,JoAnn E. Kirchner +9 more
TL;DR: The ERIC study aimed to refine a published compilation of implementation strategy terms and definitions by systematically gathering input from a wide range of stakeholders with expertise in implementation science and clinical practice to generate consensus on implementation strategies and definitions.
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
TL;DR: This work proposes guidelines for naming, defining, and operationalizing implementation strategies in terms of seven dimensions: actor, the action, action targets, temporality, dose, implementation outcomes addressed, and theoretical justification.
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback
TL;DR: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant frameworks to assess these contextual factors; however, it has been over 10 years since publication and there is a need for updates as mentioned in this paper .
Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study
Thomas J. Waltz,Byron J. Powell,Monica M. Matthieu,Monica M. Matthieu,Laura J. Damschroder,Matthew Chinman,Jeffrey L. Smith,Enola K. Proctor,JoAnn E. Kirchner,JoAnn E. Kirchner +9 more
TL;DR: The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study aims to address one area of terminological inconsistency: discrete implementation strategies involving one process or action used to support a practice change.
Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions
TL;DR: The wide heterogeneity of endorsements obtained in this study’s task suggests that there are relatively few consistent relationships between CFIR-based barriers and ERIC implementation strategies.
References
Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy.
Charles Glisson,Sonja K. Schoenwald,Anthony L. Hemmelgarn,Philip Green,Denzel Dukes,Kevin S. Armstrong,Jason E. Chapman +6 more
TL;DR: Two-level strategies that combine an organizational intervention such as ARC and an evidence-based treatment such as MST are promising approaches to implementing effective community-based mental health services.
Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review.
Nils Chaillet,Eric Dubé,Marylène Dugas,François Audibert,Caroline Tourigny,William D. Fraser,Alexandre Dumont +6 more
TL;DR: Prospective identification of efficient strategies and barriers to change is necessary to achieve a better adaptation of intervention and to improve clinical practice guidelines implementation in the field of obstetric care.
239
Toward a policy ecology of implementation of evidence-based practices in public mental health settings.
TL;DR: Policymaking that addresses in an integrated way the ecology of implementation at the levels of provider organizations, governmental regulatory agencies, and their surrounding political and societal milieu is required to successfully and sustainably implement EBPs over the long term.
•Book
Knowledge Translation in Healthcare
Alison Kitson,Rick Wiechula,Susan Salmond,Zoe Jordan +3 more
- 05 Nov 2012
230
Mission Drift in Qualitative Research, or Moving Toward a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies, Moving Back to a More Systematic Narrative Review.
TL;DR: This paper argued that the systematic review of qualitative research is best served by relying upon qualitative methods themselves and made a case for strengthening the narrative literature review and using narrative itself as a method of review.