A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health.
Byron J. Powell,J. Curtis McMillen,Enola K. Proctor,Chris Carpenter,Richard T. Griffey,Alicia C. Bunger,Joseph E. Glass,Jennifer L. York +7 more
TL;DR: This consolidated compilation can serve as a reference to stakeholders who wish to implement clinical innovations in health and mental health care and can facilitate the development of multifaceted, multilevel implementation plans that are tailored to local contexts.
read more
Abstract: Efforts to identify, develop, refine, and test strategies to disseminate and implement evidence-based treatments have been prioritized in order to improve the quality of health and mental health care delivery. However, this task is complicated by an implementation science literature characterized by inconsistent language use and inadequate descriptions of implementation strategies. This article brings more depth and clarity to implementation research and practice by presenting a consolidated compilation of discrete implementation strategies, based on a review of 205 sources published between 1995 and 2011. The resulting compilation includes 68 implementation strategies and definitions, which are grouped according to six key implementation processes: planning, educating, financing, restructuring, managing quality, and attending to the policy context. This consolidated compilation can serve as a reference to stakeholders who wish to implement clinical innovations in health and mental health care and can fac...
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.
Byron J. Powell,Thomas J. Waltz,Matthew Chinman,Laura J. Damschroder,Jeffrey L. Smith,Monica M. Matthieu,Monica M. Matthieu,Enola K. Proctor,JoAnn E. Kirchner,JoAnn E. Kirchner +9 more
TL;DR: The ERIC study aimed to refine a published compilation of implementation strategy terms and definitions by systematically gathering input from a wide range of stakeholders with expertise in implementation science and clinical practice to generate consensus on implementation strategies and definitions.
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
TL;DR: This work proposes guidelines for naming, defining, and operationalizing implementation strategies in terms of seven dimensions: actor, the action, action targets, temporality, dose, implementation outcomes addressed, and theoretical justification.
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback
TL;DR: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant frameworks to assess these contextual factors; however, it has been over 10 years since publication and there is a need for updates as mentioned in this paper .
Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study
Thomas J. Waltz,Byron J. Powell,Monica M. Matthieu,Monica M. Matthieu,Laura J. Damschroder,Matthew Chinman,Jeffrey L. Smith,Enola K. Proctor,JoAnn E. Kirchner,JoAnn E. Kirchner +9 more
TL;DR: The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study aims to address one area of terminological inconsistency: discrete implementation strategies involving one process or action used to support a practice change.
Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions
TL;DR: The wide heterogeneity of endorsements obtained in this study’s task suggests that there are relatively few consistent relationships between CFIR-based barriers and ERIC implementation strategies.
References
An implementation research agenda
Martin P Eccles,David Armstrong,Richard Baker,Kevin Cleary,Huw Davies,Stephen M. Davies,Paul Glasziou,Irene Ilott,Ann Louise Kinmonth,Gillian Leng,Stuart Logan,Theresa M. Marteau,Susan Michie,Hugh Rogers,Jo Rycroft-Malone,Bonnie Sibbald +15 more
TL;DR: The high level group made recommendations to the CMO to address possible ways forward to improve clinical effectiveness in the UK National Health Service (NHS) and promote clinical engagement to deliver this.
•Journal Article
Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services
Erin Stone,Sally C. Morton,Marlies E. Hulscher,Margaret Maglione,Elizabeth Roth,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Brian S. Mittman,Lisa V. Rubenstein,Laurence Z. Rubenstein,Paul G. Shekelle +9 more
TL;DR: Rates of adult immunization and cancer screening are most likely to improve when a health care organization supports performance of these activities through organizational changes in staffing and c... as mentioned in this paper,.
496
Diffusion, Dissemination, and Implementation: Who Should Do What?
TL;DR: The concepts of diffusion, dissemination, and implementation are distinguished as progressively more active steps in the process of flowing valid and reliable research information into clinical practice.
408
Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions
TL;DR: The explicit use of theory offers potential advantages in terms of facilitating a better understanding of the generalisability and replicability of implementation interventions, however, this is a relatively unexplored methodological area.
The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children's mental health treatments.
TL;DR: A current NIMH-funded study is using the ARC intervention model to support the implementation of an evidence-based treatment, Multisystemic Therapy (MST), for delinquent youth in extremely rural, impoverished communities in the Appalachian Mountains of East Tennessee.
356