Journal Article10.1080/014311697216649
A comparison of contextual classification methods using Landsat TM
22
TL;DR: In this paper, the performance of contextual classification methods is evaluated using Landsat TM data and an assumption of autocorrelated spectral reflectance is made in three of the methods.
read more
Abstract: The performance of contextual classification methods is evaluated using Landsat TM data. Classes of pixels adjacent to the pixel to be classified are assumed to be conditionally independent given the class of the pixel to be classified. An assumption of autocorrelated spectral reflectance is made in three of the methods. Methods that utilize information from one image and images from two different occasions are compared.Our results indicate that an autocorrelation method utilizing images from two different occasions performs optimally.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance
Dengsheng Lu,Qihao Weng +1 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that designing a suitable image‐processing procedure is a prerequisite for a successful classification of remotely sensed data into a thematic map and the selection of a suitable classification method is especially significant for improving classification accuracy.
Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends
TL;DR: The models, methods, and image analysis algorithms in urban remote sensing have been largely developed for the imagery of medium resolution (10–100 m), and the advent of high spatial resolution satellite images, spaceborne hyperspectral images, and LiDAR data is stimulating new research idea, and is driving the future research trends with new models and algorithms.
1.1K
Developments in Landsat Land Cover Classification Methods: A Review
Darius Phiri,Justin Morgenroth +1 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that the development of land cover classification methods grew alongside the launches of a new series of Landsat sensors and advancements in computer science, and many advancements in specific classifiers and algorithms have occurred in the last decade.
408
•Journal Article
The effect of training strategies on supervised classification at different spatial resolutions
DongMel Chen,Douglas A. Stow +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, three different training strategies often used for supervised classification (single pixel, seed, and block or polygon training) are compared in the classification of six land-use classes.
191
Contextual classification of Landsat TM images to forest inventory cover types
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the performance of six contextual classifiers from two sites in Canada were compared to results with a maximum likelihood (ML) classifier at three levels of spectral class separation.