Journal Article10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.
Walter Mischel,Yuichi Shoda +1 more
TL;DR: A theory was proposed to reconcile paradoxical findings on the invariance of personality and the variability of behavior across situations to account for individual differences in predictable patterns of variability across situations.
read more
Abstract: A theory was proposed to reconcile paradoxical findings on the invariance of personality and the variability of behavior across situations. For this purpose, individuals were assumed to differ in (a) the accessibility of cognitive-affective mediating units (such as encodings, expectancies and beliefs, affects, and goals) and (b) the organization of relationships through which these units interact with each other and with psychological features of situations. The theory accounts for individual differences in predictable patterns of variability across situations (e.g., if A. then she X, but ifE then she Y), as well as for overall average levels of behavior, as essential expressions or behavioral signatures of the same underlying personality system. Situations, personality dispositions, dynamics, and structure were reconceptualized from this perspective. The construct of personality rests on the assumption that individuals are characterized by distinctive qualities that are relatively invariant across situations and over time. In a century of personality research, however, abundant evidence has documented that individual differences in social behaviors tend to be surprisingly variable across different situations. Although this finding has been interpreted as evidence against the utility of the personality construct, we show that it need not be and, on the contrary, that this variability reflects some of the essence of personality coherence. When personality is conceptualized as a stable system that mediates how the individual selects, construes, and processes social information and generates social behaviors, it becomes possible to account simultaneously for both the invariant qualities of the underlying personality and the predictable variability across situations in some of its characteristic behavioral expressions. In this article, we begin with a review of recent empirical data demonstrating that individuals are characterized not only by stable individual differences in their overall levels of behavior, but also by distinctive and stable patterns of behavior variability across situations. These findings invite a new conception of personality in which such patterns of variability are seen not as
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Self-focused and feeling fine: Assessing state narcissism and its relation to well-being
TL;DR: Within-person variability in "normal" grandiose narcissism was associated with greater life satisfaction, greater positive affect and greater hostility as mentioned in this paper, while withinperson variability on self-reports of narcissism reflecting more pathological expressions of self-reported narcissism (single-item narcissism Scale, and an adjective-rating measure) were also associated with daily shame and guilt.
67
Irrational beliefs and behavioral misregulation in the role of alcohol abuse among college students
TL;DR: Stress, compulsivity, irrational beliefs, and compulsivity were combined to form an “irrational coping” scale and this construct was found in multiple regression analyses to completely mediate the effect of stress on alcohol use problems, while depression was a partial mediator of this effect.
66
Human "resources"? Objectification at work.
Peter Belmi,Juliana Schroeder +1 more
TL;DR: It is proposed that objectification is more prevalent at work because people engage in more calculative and strategic thinking (i.e., making decisions by computing the costs and benefits).
66
Cultures and Persons: Characterizing National and Other Types of Cultural Difference Can Also Aid Our Understanding and Prediction of Individual Variability
TL;DR: It is shown how nation-level comparisons can be used by psychologists to improve their understanding of individual, rather than group, outcomes.
References
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
TL;DR: Theories of the self from both psychology and anthropology are integrated to define in detail the difference between a construal of self as independent and a construpal of the Self as interdependent as discussed by the authors, and these divergent construals should have specific consequences for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
•Book
Handbook of social psychology
Susan T. Fiske,Daniel T. Gilbert,Gardner Lindzey +2 more
- 01 Jan 1935
TL;DR: In this paper, Neuberg and Heine discuss the notion of belonging, acceptance, belonging, and belonging in the social world, and discuss the relationship between friendship, membership, status, power, and subordination.
18.5K
Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations
David E. Rumelhart,James L. McClelland,Au +2 more
- 17 Jul 1986
TL;DR: The fundamental principles, basic mechanisms, and formal analyses involved in the development of parallel distributed processing (PDP) systems are presented in individual chapters contributed by leading experts.
16.7K
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
TL;DR: The centrality of the self-efficacy mechanism in human agency is discussed in this paper, where the influential role of perceived collective effi- cacy in social change is analyzed, as are the social con- ditions conducive to development of collective inefficacy.
•Book
Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
Albert Bandura
- 11 Oct 1985
TL;DR: In this paper, models of Human Nature and Casualty are used to model human nature and human health, and a set of self-regulatory mechanisms are proposed. But they do not consider the role of cognitive regulators.
11.2K
Related Papers (5)
Lawrence A. Pervin
- 05 Jun 1992
Albert Bandura
- 01 Jan 1997
Leona S. Aiken,Stephen G. West +1 more
- 01 Jan 1991