Book Chapter10.1515/9783110214338.3.353
15. Interpersonal issues in court: Rebellion, resistance and other ways of behaving badly
Miriam A. Locher,Sage L. Graham +1 more
- 14 Jan 2010
14
About: The article was published on 14 Jan 2010. The article focuses on the topics: Interpersonal communication.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Negotiating face in feedback conferences:a linguistic ethnographic analysis
TL;DR: The authors examined the negotiation of face in post observation feedback conferences on an initial teacher training program and found that participants also interact in ways that challenge the generic norms, some of which might be considered more conventionally face attacking.
58
Im)politeness and Relationality
Jun Ohashi,Wei-Lin Melody Chang +1 more
- 01 Apr 2017
TL;DR: In this article, two case studies in both Japanese and Chinese are presented to highlight the significance of studying emic concepts of relationality and related concepts, including the balance sheet of obligation in Japanese contexts, and relational ties and relational entitlements in Taiwanese interactions.
Evaluative stancetaking in courtroom opening statements
Abstract: Abstract Drawing upon a corpus of five high-profile contemporary Anglo-American trials, this study explores and elucidates, qualitatively and quantitatively, the process of evaluative stancetaking in courtroom opening statements. In particular, the study examines such stance resources as self-mention, hedges, boosters, and attitude markers. The findings reveal that evaluative stance expressions constitute an integral part of the opening statements of both the prosecution and defense lawyers, exhibiting similar frequency patterns. Of these resources, devices that signal commitment or lack thereof (i. e., boosters and hedges) appear to occur frequently and outnumber explicit attitude markers, which occur least frequently. It is through these devices that lawyers are able to subtly bypass the legal constraints that prohibit explicit display of personal opinions and comments on the evidence.
17
Investigating audience orientation in courtroom communication: The case of the closing argument
TL;DR: In this paper, an empirical study of audience orientation, investigating lawyers' overt interpersonal negotiation with jurors, is presented, which attests to the centrality of relational work in accomplishing transactional goals in institutional discourses.
8
References
Negotiating face in feedback conferences:a linguistic ethnographic analysis
TL;DR: The authors examined the negotiation of face in post observation feedback conferences on an initial teacher training program and found that participants also interact in ways that challenge the generic norms, some of which might be considered more conventionally face attacking.
58
Im)politeness and Relationality
Jun Ohashi,Wei-Lin Melody Chang +1 more
- 01 Apr 2017
TL;DR: In this article, two case studies in both Japanese and Chinese are presented to highlight the significance of studying emic concepts of relationality and related concepts, including the balance sheet of obligation in Japanese contexts, and relational ties and relational entitlements in Taiwanese interactions.
Investigating audience orientation in courtroom communication: The case of the closing argument
TL;DR: In this paper, an empirical study of audience orientation, investigating lawyers' overt interpersonal negotiation with jurors, is presented, which attests to the centrality of relational work in accomplishing transactional goals in institutional discourses.
8
•Journal Article
Between solidarity and argument: Interpersonal negotiation in two legal genres.
TL;DR: In this paper, a comparative analysis of interpersonal negotiation in two monologic courtroom genres: the opening statement and closing argument is presented, which reveals distinct interactional patterns which are indicative of the interactive goals of the two speech genres.