About: Westerly is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Poetry & Literary criticism. It has an ISSN identifier of 0043-342X. Over the lifetime, 55 publications have been published receiving 134 citations.
TL;DR: The authors situate Winton's career and this particular novel in what can be called the field of Australian literature, which is now a very broad spectrum of institutions, personnel, practices and values that is surprisingly complex and diverse.
Abstract: Let me begin by saying what I'm not going to do in this paper: I'm not going to do what used to be called a “close reading” of Tim Winton's Cloudstreet. I'm not going to wheel out a theoretical approach through which to interpret the text, as if the reading I could produce by that means were somehow more authoritative than any other. Instead, what I will do is situate Winton's career and this particular novel in what can be called the field of Australian literature. In using this term field, I mean to indicate the whole system involved in the production and reception of Australian literature. This is now a very broad spectrum of institutions, personnel, practices and values that is surprisingly complex and diverse. It is now so extensive that it isn't even confined to Australia. And academic literary criticism — in the sense of theoretically-driven textual analysis — is only one part of that field. Many would say that it's not even the most important part.
TL;DR: For example, the authors argues that Malouf's text inscribes an "erasure of the political" through his literarytranslation of the "political into the psychological, and matters of history and======politics into questions of creativity and aesthetics".
Abstract: The publication of David Malouf's Remembering Babylon met with an
ambivalent reception.' The novel is a complex and often deeply moving
narrative that vividly evokes the displacement, dispossession, uncertainties
and anxieties of living in the border or contact zones in mid-nineteenth
century Australia. Yet it radically divided literary critics, their divergent
responses exacerhated by the socio-cultural context of its publication. This
was in 1993, the International Yearof Indigenous Peoples, and one year after
the momentous Mabo v. Queensland High Court ruling on native title. My own
position in the ongoing debate is along the lines of Peter Otto's assertion that
Malouf's text inscribes an "erasure of the political" through his literary
translation of the "political into the psychological, and matters of history and
politics into questions of creativity and aesthetics'? and in compliance with
Suvendrini Perera's postcolonial critique of Malouf's protagonist as being
centred within a "discourse of happy hyridisation".' However, rather than
simply re-engaging with this debate, I want to offer a reading of the
underlying theme of shame in Remembering Babylon, a subject that has so far
been neglected in critical discussions of this novel.