Victimology Society of Serbia and Prometej-Beograd
About: Temida is an academic journal published by Victimology Society of Serbia and Prometej-Beograd. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Criminal justice & Domestic violence. It has an ISSN identifier of 1450-6637. It is also open access. Over the lifetime, 256 publications have been published receiving 1016 citations. The journal is also known as: Temida (Srpsko izd.).
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the questions of introducing and application of restorative justice in order to reach the balance of interests between a victim, society and a delinquent, and emphasize the values of Restorative justice process.
Abstract: In the article the author deals with the basic theoretical statements and discussions about the practical use of restorative justice. She discusses the questions of introducing and application of restorative justice in order to reach the balance of interests between a victim, society and a delinquent. There is no unique statement about the restorative justice concept, so the authors make this concept by listing certain activities with rispect of standards and principles. Also she emphasizes the values of restorative justice process. A part of the article is dedicated to the standards for restorative justice that are harmonized with the international documents of human rights. .
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the victimization of women in the social networking websites in general, analyze the trends of such victimization from socio- legal - victimological angle and ascertain the reasons for the growth of victimization.
Abstract: Web 2.01 has redefined the virtual life of ordinary individuals and has given wide opportunities to internet users including women to exchange ideas, interact with like minded people and participate in the development of virtual societies as per one's own choices. Social networking websites (SNWs), a segment of Web 2.0 is very popular among the internet users. However, there is a dark side of these SNW's too. They have become havens for offenders to victimize women, the most vulnerable targets in the internet, after children. In this paper, we examine the victimization of women in the social networking websites in general, analyze the trends of such victimization from socio - legal - victimological angle and ascertain the reasons for the growth of such victimization.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined sexual harassment from a comparative perspective, focusing on the definition of sexual inequality, incidence of sexual harassment of students in tertiary institutions, effects of sexual exploitation on victims, and victims' responses to sexual harassment.
Abstract: Sexual harassment is not a new phenomenon in tertiary institutions. It has
been receiving considerable attention in research and the media and public
awareness has increased dramatically. However, the term sexual harassment is
not used uniformly across the globe because countries have defined it
differently. Consequently, prevalence of sexual harassment in education
varies across cultures. This paper examines sexual harassment from a
comparative perspective. It specifically focuses on the definition of sexual
harassment, incidence of sexual harassment of students in tertiary
institutions, effects of sexual harassment on victims; and victims’ responses
to sexual harassment. It also offers suggestions for curtailing sexual
harassment in these institutions.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the appropriateness of restorative justice (RJ) measures in addressing sexual assault, primarily with reference to experience of Restorative dialogues as practiced at the Centre for Victims of Sexual============ Assault in Copenhagen, and it takes a feminist approach to the application of============ Restorative justice measures to sexual assault.
Abstract: The appropriateness of restorative justice (RJ) for gendered violence
offences such as domestic violence and sexual assault has always been and
still is highly contested. This paper focuses on the appropriateness of RJ
measures in addressing sexual assault, primarily with reference to experience
of restorative dialogues as practiced at the Centre for Victims of Sexual
Assault in Copenhagen, and it takes a feminist approach to the application of
RJ measures to sexual assault. Within this framework, the paper tackles two
issues in particular: the privacy element of RJ versus the public aspect of
the criminal justice system (CJS), and the intersection of the CJS and RJ in
cases of sexual assault. In relation to the relationship between CJS and RJ,
the authors argue that RJ could be used for victims of sexual assault, not
primarily as part of diversion programmes, but when offered apart from and/or
parallel to the CJS. In relation to the private/public debate, the authors
argue that while RJ encounters, by taking place in highly confidential
settings, might have a negative impact on efforts by women’s movements to
move violence against women out of the private and into the public realm,
creating high standard alternatives for individual women who are in need of
support and constantly generating public debate about gendered violence is a
good feminist response to this complex issue.