About: Stats is an academic journal published by Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Computer science & Medicine. It has an ISSN identifier of 2571-905X. It is also open access. Over the lifetime, 114 publications have been published receiving 50 citations.
TL;DR: In this article , the authors show that SAM is not more robust to local model misspecifications than one-step estimation approaches and propose a bootstrap-bias-corrected LSAM estimate that provides less biased estimates in finite samples.
Abstract: Structural equation models (SEM), or confirmatory factor analysis as a special case, contain model parameters at the measurement part and the structural part. In most social-science SEM applications, all parameters are simultaneously estimated in a one-step approach (e.g., with maximum likelihood estimation). In a recent article, Rosseel and Loh (2022, Psychol. Methods) proposed a two-step structural after measurement (SAM) approach to SEM that estimates the parameters of the measurement model in the first step and the parameters of the structural model in the second step. Rosseel and Loh claimed that SAM is more robust to local model misspecifications (i.e., cross loadings and residual correlations) than one-step maximum likelihood estimation. In this article, it is demonstrated with analytical derivations and simulation studies that SAM is generally not more robust to misspecifications than one-step estimation approaches. Alternative estimation methods are proposed that provide more robustness to misspecifications. SAM suffers from finite-sample bias that depends on the size of factor reliability and factor correlations. A bootstrap-bias-corrected LSAM estimate provides less biased estimates in finite samples. Nevertheless, we argue in the discussion section that applied researchers should nevertheless adopt SAM because robustness to local misspecifications is an irrelevant property when applying SAM. Parameter estimates in a structural model are of interest because intentionally misspecified SEMs frequently offer clearly interpretable factors. In contrast, SEMs with some empirically driven model modifications will result in biased estimates of the structural parameters because the meaning of factors is unintentionally changed.
TL;DR: In this paper , a two-parameter discrete distribution that can be obtained by compounding the Poisson and extended exponential distributions is proposed, which has tractable and explicit forms for its statistical properties.
Abstract: The significance of count data modeling and its applications to real-world phenomena have been highlighted in several research studies. The present study focuses on a two-parameter discrete distribution that can be obtained by compounding the Poisson and extended exponential distributions. It has tractable and explicit forms for its statistical properties. The maximum likelihood estimation method is used to estimate the unknown parameters. An extensive simulation study was also performed. In this paper, the significance of the proposed distribution is demonstrated in a count regression model and in a first-order integer-valued autoregressive process, referred to as the INAR(1) process. In addition to this, the empirical importance of the proposed model is proved through three real-data applications, and the empirical findings indicate that the proposed INAR(1) model provides better results than other competitive models for time series of counts that display overdispersion.
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors compared the performance regularized estimation and several robust linking approaches in three simulation studies that address the one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parallel logistic models, respectively, in order to avoid the biased estimation of groups, appropriate statistical methods for handling differential item functioning.
Abstract: In the social sciences, the performance of two groups is frequently compared based on a cognitive test involving binary items. Item response models are often utilized for comparing the two groups. However, the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) can impact group comparisons. In order to avoid the biased estimation of groups, appropriate statistical methods for handling differential item functioning are required. This article compares the performance-regularized estimation and several robust linking approaches in three simulation studies that address the one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parameter logistic (2PL) models, respectively. It turned out that robust linking approaches are at least as effective as the regularized estimation approach in most of the conditions in the simulation studies.
TL;DR: Different item parameter estimation methods for the Rasch model are systematically compared and minimum chi-square (MINCHI) estimation was the best-performing LIM method, demonstrating that JML estimation and LIM can still prove helpful in applied research.
Abstract: The Rasch model is one of the most prominent item response models. In this article, different item parameter estimation methods for the Rasch model are systematically compared through a comprehensive simulation study: Different alternatives of joint maximum likelihood (JML) estimation, different alternatives of marginal maximum likelihood (MML) estimation, conditional maximum likelihood (CML) estimation, and several limited information methods (LIM). The type of ability distribution (i.e., nonnormality), the number of items, sample size, and the distribution of item difficulties were systematically varied. Across different simulation conditions, MML methods with flexible distributional specifications can be at least as efficient as CML. Moreover, in many situations (i.e., for long tests), penalized JML and JML with ε adjustment resulted in very efficient estimates and might be considered alternatives to JML implementations currently used in statistical software. Moreover, minimum chi-square (MINCHI) estimation was the best-performing LIM method. These findings demonstrate that JML estimation and LIM can still prove helpful in applied research.
TL;DR: In this paper , a convolutional deep Q-learning network (CDQN) with multiple price input is proposed to solve the instability issue intrinsic to the deep Qlearning network.
Abstract: In recent years, reinforcement learning (RL) has seen increasing applications in the financial industry, especially in quantitative trading and portfolio optimization when the focus is on the long-term reward rather than short-term profit. Sequential decision making and Markov decision processes are rather suited for this type of application. Through trial and error based on historical data, an agent can learn the characteristics of the market and evolve an algorithm to maximize the cumulative returns. In this work, we propose a novel RL trading algorithm utilizing random perturbation of the Q-network and account for the more realistic nonlinear transaction costs. In summary, we first design a new near-quadratic transaction cost function considering the slippage. Next, we develop a convolutional deep Q-learning network (CDQN) with multiple price input based on this cost functions. We further propose a random perturbation (rp) method to modify the learning network to solve the instability issue intrinsic to the deep Q-learning network. Finally, we use this newly developed CDQN-rp algorithm to make trading decisions based on the daily stock prices of Apple (AAPL), Meta (FB), and Bitcoin (BTC) and demonstrate its strengths over other quantitative trading methods.